CTA Case No. 173 (Decision)
� uc ~ 'HT OF 1 r t.1.tio .rs . - su ... -- - ... n (r c t. J.n .... s.. 1.. (.. 0t ... t �,t n !' s f t� t si s g~ .i rt i � ~ 0 � t Co 0 � 11 95 /) /
>\:"c <' �- t-: .. . ... 2 ' ' C . 'T � .~. � C/�~) .! NO. .J "13 n ... ' 'hile th c s ) t . pecifJ:cally on t<> '"' �St <li :r s. ond ' t fr i ex� �tin t � ' 1 i .ssu by � ' .. n � �n u e b �1e Int l <QV n h vi j r ' de th l'g nt r. t"' H to ;r.;;.... i �..he cclleetio � cf S:lid taxa~ was i�li thdr n. T e cl � y th l <. l � 95 . ct e acts i ave h "' ..e-tir. l'otestaot
- .... �� .I 97
.... - - .' ~ 98
a. u.t f cVlr been trken from t~� inte 08 ~:rned by " 99
ch .. tl .,; ~ 1 .... 9 suJ-jeet 6 ... �x � ,.,e qu t ,oth dono ' a ( dot .l.~.-, 9o5 t e sur of - t }'d; , . . ~. i " . of t to 100 Yf
73 .. - th ort .. n n ne . ly. \111 th :cnool .r:rn r..... c:runt � th ion 't t e ,....._ J ol nd r ~ the i 0? on h O:C ~tit t \1- ~ vat.'ally rl tt July 0 ~(�~0 en dat 1 19~ 5t~-'> . q�ot~d �) r"' i t at !., :rans of �.i t t.e ,.. .. � only lndividu. ~ ar~ \�. i l 101
!n ~vi l t ..l .J or ti. t 0 (..;J:"Oti l. ill s a. ,.V\J b~e:t .c ;.'pf) t ~l.lt .ax. at. l:'equil."e<'l f��le a e ~�tocktt ..~re the en +.... ile if i re,. ct .. i i ual � e -ch . 'tl'1t , A u y f mr,; ~nd ation ., 7� L.. �~..n9 o 'tmo... 's .~ � e. 102
DEC! C.T. � 173 - 9 -� It is clear , therefore , that th ssociation is not subject to the donor ' s gift tax on the transfer by it to the School of the sum of 9 , 252. 48. Heithe.r may the . e bers of t e ssoci ation be held liable to th tax �t ap pearing that the share of e c in the onation i ot exceed � 1 ( ee lst indorse- m nt d te cember 20 , 1954 of Examiner �naldo � L ez , pa e 12, .1�� records. ) 'e no co e to the taxability of the chool , th recipient of the sum of ;9 ,25?.48. ~ether the don a- tion is tre ted as gi ts of t e individual members of '7 t s ciati on or as gi ts of the persons whc contrib- uted to th Endowment Fund of the Association , it ap - t t ea ch contr~'butor gave not more than 1 ,000. � r the la , gifts by an individual donor to a done >J not exceed�ng -1,000. 00 are not subject to the donorts and donee ' s ift taxes. ( ec. 112 , Rev. Code. pu~oses f i or of h don e �s gift tax , �here gifts ar rna by t o or 1 or donors in favor of the same donee, the ifts made by ach donor are considered s - / ar tely from the gifts of the other donors and ar e en - titled to separate ex empt~ons . F r this reason, the l a re uires that s parate x turns be f~led by the one covering gifts receiv f~o ac1 individual do- no~LSec. 115(b), Rev. Code~ Therefore , the Sc ool , 1 Effoctive eptember 15, 1950, donatio s or gifts in f avor of e uc tiona! institutions irrespec- tive of , unt ar not subject t o the donor ' s gift tax , pursuant to s ction 4 of Republic . ct o. 579. 103
73 - f t0 ts t c an il a�
More in CTA Decisions
- MIRANT PAGBILAO CORPORATION (Formerly Southern Energy Quezon, Inc.) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with CTA En Banc Case No. 225)(CTA Case No. EB 216)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CBK POWER COMPANY LIMITED(CTA Case No. EB 2801)
- THE CITY OF MAKATI AND THE CITY TREASURER OF MAKATI v. CEMCO HOLDINGS, INC.(CTA Case No. AC-166)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. GREENLEE CP ELECTRICAL CORP.,(CTA Case No. EB 2821)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE VS. SWIFT FOODS, INC.,(CTA Case No. EB 1613)
- CTA Case No. 5699 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5699)
- CTA Case No. 6478 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6478)
- GIC PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY, GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE INVESTMENT CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8965)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.