CTA Case No. 2978 (Resolution)
REPUBLir OF ni:: PliiLJPPaNKS COU i OF TAX APPEALS or�a70N CITY � '-tlCO UCT D VIC I ( IL.) I c �� � o. 297 Petitio r. - versus - C.T.A. C IO FI , � Respon ent. ' 0LU I 0 cti g on etitio er�a " tion ith.4raw Petition For Revi v" file4 n c r �� 1 1 on the r un tha it claim f r t x credit in- volve rei h s alr � y n all by the ure of I tarnal even e with t 1 suance of �the orr�� ndi CAdit � in t unt of � l ....1 in fav r of p titio r. � d there beiD no objec ion n the r of re nd nt. th s 1<! motion i hereby GRANT D. ccordi gly. 1 t th petit! n for r vi dee d with4ra an t ov -� title case co - si erad closed and te inated. SO D ED. ue o City. r a ila. o � r 11. 19 1. Jud fl c ~./ UI aaociate Judge _, 8 '
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.