[ G. R. No. 38013. August 11, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38013. August 11, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38013
[ G. R. No. 38013. August 11, 1934 ]
JOSE TIROL, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. JOSE P. SOLINUM, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________26th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Capiz________, dated the __________25th__________ day of __________January_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee_________ from the __________the appellant_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 205953, June 06, 2018
- A.C. No. 4083, March 27, 2000
- [ G.R. NO. 161067. March 14, 2008 ](572 Phil. 244)
- [ G.R. No. 177219. July 09, 2010 ](638 Phil. 660)
- A.M. No. P-01-1451 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 99-563-P), February 28, 2003
- [ G.R. No. 14303. March 24, 1960 ](G.R. No. 14303)
- [ G. R. No. 16202. November 05, 1920 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-3738. November 20, 1951 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.