CTA Resolutions CTA Case No. 34373437 1982-08-10
CTA Case No. 3437 (Resolution)
IUPUBUC 0:' 1 R i IDLJPPP\,.,'Jil. r.'O!JRT ~ JI.X F � LS (OW lt70N C"!"!"V P ti i on r, C. �r . A. CASE NO . 343 7 - v r us TIE COHMISSIOr.J~ Oi' I .. TE!L~A n n t. - - J( ...... 0 L li I u Conflr � <J th_ or t r t.)ivcn in op n Cour on , ugu t 2 , 1902 , thi�- c ....s is i � i or non- p a r nee n lac. of int r wt. ~v �C te on th par of t l ti I r. su 0 . IU zon Ci .;; , I �gut.t 10, ...LJ,( .').... ro.,;idi .. O. lJU!: Judgt,;
More in CTA Resolutions
- ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8445)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. TOLEDO POWER COMPANY(CTA Case No. EB 2045)
- FORT PALM SPRING CONDOMINIUM CORPORATION v. HON. CAESAR R. DULAY, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Bureau of Internal Revenue(CTA Case No. 9999)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. GLORIA F. TUYAY(CTA Case No. O-154)
- CTA Case No. 697 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 697)
- BRYAN M. TORREGOSA v. REGIONAL DIRECTOR BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE, DAVAO CITY REVENUE REGION 19(CTA Case No. EB 2520)
- CALIX IMPORT AND EXPORT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. 10389)
- CTA Case No. 4003 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 4003)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.