CTA Case No. 3515 (Resolution)

'. . r.. .r P ��s , ... '.. ��uLS LIN Cl fY C~uU uOCT 1S 1 lluSPITAL , :c ., C . ~ � � C~~B sO . 3515 t1.tioner , - versus - a . L ~..~Cllf::'l'A 1 as Actin':) 1. iter o Int rn 1 nue , k~O ueut . X- - - - - - - ~- - ~- - ~ - r a t o in ~ur~ 1.d its app ~1 to thts court as i1ciicat in th �~..,o iot '.Lo �� .1 h~ra I>~�c.1t1.or." tilou o., ,;, G..).. uary 15, 19c4 Oh th grounu th.lt the e..:icl. act l..lCOt e ~.ax i >.~- ili ty 1n the .. v~nt � t it 1 52 � 5 su ~ht to b col- 1 cteu r in 1 alr dy been sett:.led through cvuprv- o Internal " ve.1 e nth petitioner ayi t lC .U.! OUH no oojac .1on o.l t.e part o.-. c :J.t;iv:-:...,nt, cl sail rot ion is ereby G � wi thur a .m i.m � -.he o<J - t1.tl d c s c j Sl.det.:a clo.e:J nd terminat ..: � SO ' ,w �. D. (Ju zon City , Metro ..lanila , . 1arc 1 2 , 1~.J � 3 .)1...-