[ G. R. No. 38640. June 18, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38640. June 18, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38640
[ G. R. No. 38640. June 18, 1934 ]
ROMAN SUSANA ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. PABLO SUSANA ET AL., DEFENDANTS, PABLO SUSANA,Z DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________2nd________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Cavite________, dated the __________8th__________ day of _________September____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant Pablo Susana.
It is further ordered that the __________the appellees_________ from the __________the appellant Pablo Susana_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 199901. October 09, 2013 ](719 Phil. 441)
- [ G.R. No. 130610. October 16, 2000 ](397 Phil. 277)
- [ G.R. No. 10472. February 26, 1958 ](G.R. No. 10472)
- [ G.R. No. 146424. November 18, 2005 ](512 Phil. 65)
- [ G.R. No. L-31060. July 29, 1971 ](148-B Phil. 105)
- ADM. CASE NO. 5910, September 21, 2005
- A.M. No. 09-3-50 MCTC, October 09, 2009
- [ G.R. No. 132748. November 24, 1999 ](377 Phil. 92; 97 OG No. 24, 3577 (June 11, 2001))
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.