[ G. R. No. 40234. July 13, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40234. July 13, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40234
[ G. R. No. 40234. July 13, 1934 ]
THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS, APPLICANT, VS. HEIRS OF MIGUEL ALCANTARA ET AL., CLAIMANTS, MATILDE MENDONES ET AL., CLAIMANTS AND APPELLEES, SMITH, BELL & CO., LTD., CLAIMANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________27th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Cavite________, dated the __________14th__________ day of __________June_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that ___________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 102390, February 01, 2002
- G.R. No. 147444, October 01, 2004
- G.R. No. 187256, February 23, 2011
- G.R. NO. 152072, January 31, 2006
- [ G.R. No. 77875. February 04, 1993 ](291-A Phil. 451; 89 OG No. 51, 7511 (December 20, 1993))
- [ G.R. No. L-48576. August 11, 1989 ](257 Phil. 324)
- G.R. No. 159230, October 18, 2010
- [ G.R. Nos. 170270 & 179411. April 02, 2009 ](602 Phil. 255)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.