[ G. R. No. 39293. June 12, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39293. June 12, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39293
[ G. R. No. 39293. June 12, 1934 ]
MARIANO NATIVIDAD PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. ELISA CUSTODIO ALIAS ELISA C. NATIVIDAD ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________26th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Davao__________, dated the__________23rd______________ day of __________November_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with double costs against the plaintiff-appellant in this instance.
It is further ordered that __________the defendnats-appellees__________ recover from __________the plaintiff-appellant __________the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 1708. August 24, 1905 ](G.R. No. 1708)
- G.R. No. 226454, November 20, 2017
- [ G.R. No. 227309. August 16, 2017 ](816 Phil. 940)
- [ G.R. No. L-44909. January 31, 1978 ](171 Phil. 404; 74 OG No. 18, 3467 (May 1, 1978))
- [ G.R. No. 92481. November 09, 1990 ](269 Phil. 324)
- [ G.R. No. L-3858. March 14, 1952 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-43659. December 21, 1990 ](270 Phil. 637)
- [ G.R. No. 58854. March 25, 1982 ](198 Phil. 448; 80 OG No. 10, 1488 (March 5, 1984))
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.