[ G. R. No. 40321. June 09, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40321. June 09, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40321
[ G. R. No. 40321. June 09, 1934 ]
ROMANA SOTELO ETC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS.RAMON SOTELO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________24th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of _________Manila__________, dated the__________29th______________ day of __________April_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, reversed without costs.
It is further ordered that _________xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________ recover from xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________ the sum of P __xx__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 238453, July 31, 2019
- [ G. R. No. 43596. October 31, 1936 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-26454. May 21, 1969 ](138 Phil. 269)
- [ G.R. No. 207513. June 16, 2014 ](736 Phil. 415)
- G.R. No. 130965, August 22, 2002
- [ G.R. No. 235725. September 28, 2022 ](930 Phil. 447)
- [ G.R. No. 12692. January 30, 1960 ](G.R. No. 12692)
- [ G.R. No. 171468. August 24, 2011 ](671 Phil. 638)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.