CTA Case No. 3109 (Resolution)
NIL CT lC C PA Y� Petitioner, - ver u - C. T . A. CAS NO . 3109 CO MIS I OF I T EVKNU � Re pond nt. X- - ~- - ~- - ~- RES 0 LUTI 0 It app t p titioner is lono r intere e in pur uin it pp 1 to this Court indic ted in he " o ion o Dis 1 s" fil d on Jun 4, 1 7 on th ground th t th de icie cy inco t X ss s nt invo1v h rein h d a1r dy en � ttl d thr ugh c r i e 1th p tition r paying t e nt o .. , 1.20 re r nting 10% of 1 a 11 ax cy, .ld h r .tng no obj ction on th rt r spo dent1 he court r so1v � a r ye for. to gr nt i tion. L t t p tition for revi di i d nd thi c con i r d c1o d n t rmin t d. o. u n City, tro nil � Jun 2 � 1987. RO UlN J d. 20 ~
More in CTA Resolutions
- CITYTRUST INVESTMENT PHILIPPINES v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5517)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES AND BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE, as represented by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. RAPPLER HOLDINGS CORPORATION and MARIA A. RESSA(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-126)
- CTA Case No. 4253 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 4253)
- FLUOR DANIEL, INC. - PHILIPPINES v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8444)
- AMADEUS MARKETING PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8578)
- DONATO C. CRUZ TRADING v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9721)
- CTA Case No. 4425 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 4425)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. TRUSTMARK HOLDINGS CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1697)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.