CTA Case No. 511 (Decision)
ne r. , , � n �i 1- 1 - - - - . . . . . lllill .... __ ... -----.. .---~----_-_______ -__-_-_~-_ ef c x- � l' 18 2
� .. .. � c y� c � � � � . i y �7 � 183
n� � 1 � n s p .. J 1g .. c � y f ion f Ti � l il �
-- nv 1 � ( � � -�� � � e 1 1 - � � - i - � of -
�l .. r ... f 1 1 f <: .... s -- ,.. �� c ,... - c no
� - iti 1� 1 p1 0 r;y ) ny �1 � �� � 1 � � . fi � ( .1 v. � � � 0 ( t �� i in 1 e y io t on 1~ -to rq4V lK~ be,~ u-na fit r. P
�1 h �l fi -7 - 'y I ' .,. � - � - h . 'f v d 1 3. � .. n ... 't i't. j f .... ' .,. . "'� "' ftt n ... n � ! { (" , ~ !'C � -~ .... f , 1 ... n. T' � � f 0 ( c. 3 .... . n1 � vio 1 ,
� -- - -... � ' .. n �� n - v ne if" . s � � c y �1 � � 1 189
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 4266 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4266)
- SOLID VIDEO CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2195)
- ABN--AMRO SAVINGS BANK CORPORATION v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7089)
- CTA Case No. 4879 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4879)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-55 (Decision)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-55)
- SAN PAOLO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1388)
- PARITY PACKAGING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1938)
- MINDANAO CONTAINER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10513)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.