[ G. R. No. 38737. June 25, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38737. June 25, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38737
[ G. R. No. 38737. June 25, 1934 ]
VICENTE PASUMBAL, ET AL., APPLICANTS AND APPELLANTS, VS. DIRECTOR OF LANDS, ET AL., OPPOSITORS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________9th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Camarines Sur________, dated the __________30th__________ day of _________July____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellants.
It is further ordered that the __________the appellees_________ from the __________the appellants_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. Nos. 113511-12. July 11, 1997 ](341 Phil. 355)
- [ G.R. No. 97839. April 22, 1993 ](293 Phil. 490)
- [ G.R. Nos. 210220-21. April 06, 2016 ](784 Phil. 172; 113 OG No. 8, 1556 (February 20, 2017))
- [ G.R. No. 223528. January 11, 2017 ](803 Phil. 277)
- [ G. R. No. L-9109. July 24, 1957 ]
- A.M. No. 99-11-06-SC, February 15, 2000
- A.M. No. 00-7-09-CA, March 27, 2001
- G.R. No. 178039, January 19, 2011
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.