CTA Case No. 101 (Resolution)
. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES --D<""- COURT OF TAX APPEALS MANILA RUFmO LOPEZ & SONS, INC ., Petitioner, - versus - C,T.A . CASS NO. 101 THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTGJS , Respondent �. x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x RESOLUTION Acting on the ftoMotion to Dismiss" filed by counsel for the respondent on April 23, 1955, and it appearing& 1. That urrler Section 7 of Republic Act No . 1125, otherwise known as 'An Act Creating the Court of Tax Ap- peals , " this Court is conferred exclusive appellate juris- diction to review by appeal onlx the decisions of the Col- lector of Internal Revenue , Commissioner of Customs , and the Provincial and City Boards of Assessment Appeals; 2. That the decision which the herein petitioner prays this Court to review and declare null and void in his "Petition for Review 11 filed on March 23 , 1955, is a decision of the Collector of Customs of Manila which is not one of those mentioned in Section 7 of Republic Act No . 1125; and 3. That in a resolution promulgated by this Court on January 22, 1955, in C.T . A. Case No . 17, entitled 11Acting Collector of Customs , Petitioner-Appellant vs . Acting Commissioner of Customs , Respondent-Appellee" , this Court clarified the -appa-rent conflict between Sections 7 and 11 of Republic Act No , 1125 in the following manner& '
RESOLuriON - C.T�� CASE NO . 101 - 2- "The phrase 'Collector of Customs ' appearing in the above-mentioned provision (Section 11) of Republic Act No . 1125 is clearly an oversight on the part of Congress . It should read ' Commis- sioner of Customs ' to make the provision conform with Section 7 of the said Republic ct and Sec- tion 1380 of the Revised Administrative Code . " WHEREFORE , finding the ' iotion to Dismiss" of counsel for the respondent well-founded and meritorious , the same is hereby granted . Let this case be, as it is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, with costs against the petitioner. SO ORDERED . Manila , Philippines, May 23, 1955. AAR~ Presiding Judge
More in CTA Resolutions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CARMEN COPPER CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2528)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. FILMINERA RESOURCES CORPORATION,(CTA Case No. EB 1649)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. NYK-FILJAPAN SHIPPING CORP.(CTA Case No. EB 2402)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. CESAR VACUNAWA LEBITE (Address:Sitio 3 Kabilugan St., Gulod, Novaliches, Quezon City)(CTA Case No. O-913)
- CHEVRON HOLDINGS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9021)
- CTA Case No. 2004 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2004)
- CTA Case No. 3278 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3278)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. WILL TEAM PH, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2884)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.