[ G. R. No. 39611. July 25, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39611. July 25, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39611
[ G. R. No. 39611. July 25, 1934 ]
SANTIAGO CABACTULAN ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. MODESTO DADO ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPEELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________9th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Misamis Oriental________, dated the __________8th__________ day of __________October_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. Cost against appellants.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees___________ recover from ___________the appellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 28759. September 19, 1928 ](G.R. No. 28759)
- G.R. No. 127882, December 01, 2004
- [ G.R. No. 156809. March 04, 2009 ](599 Phil. 708)
- A.C. No. 11600, June 19, 2017
- [ G.R. No. 10029. July 15, 1918 ](G.R. No. 10029)
- G.R. No. 167756, April 09, 2008
- G.R. No. 232247, April 23, 2018
- [ G.R. No. 213299. April 19, 2016 ](785 Phil. 221)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.