[ G. R. No. 40136. July 13, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40136. July 13, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40136
[ G. R. No. 40136. July 13, 1934 ]
MILANO HITONES, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEES, VS. BONIFACIO MARIZO DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________22nd________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Iloilo________, dated the __________24th__________ day of __________March_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee __________ recover from __________the appellant __________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 223366. August 01, 2017 ](815 Phil. 91)
- [ G.R. No. 138955. October 29, 2002 ](439 Phil. 966)
- [ G.R. No. 129164. July 24, 2000 ](391 Phil. 257)
- G.R. No. 185841, August 04, 2009
- [ G.R. NO. 147912. April 26, 2006 ](522 Phil. 313)
- A.C. No. 13986 (Formerly CBD Case No. 12-3681), February 26, 2025
- A.M. No. RTJ-97-1382 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 95-22-RTJ), July 17, 1997
- G.R. No. 239906, August 26, 2020
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.