Employers Bad Faith Actions Employee Rights AND Remedies IN THE Philippines

---

When a company acts in bad faith, the law provides remedies that go beyond simple compensation. The Supreme Court case of Sarkies Tours Philippines, Inc. v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 108897, October 2, 1997) illustrates how Philippine courts penalize bad faith and negligence, even when the injured party is a passenger rather than an employee. This decision clarifies the standards of care expected from businesses and the damages available to those who suffer due to corporate misconduct.

The Facts of the Case

On August 31, 1984, Fatima Fortades boarded a De Luxe bus in Manila bound for Legazpi City. She carried three pieces of luggage containing her optometry review books, trial lenses, passport, visa, and her mother's U.S. immigration card. A bus employee helped load the bags into the compartment.

During a stopover in Daet, passengers discovered that all but one bag had fallen from the open compartment. The driver ignored suggestions to retrace the route and continued to Legazpi. When Fatima reported the loss, the company offered only P1,000 per bag, which she refused.

After months of fruitless follow-ups, the family filed a damage suit for breach of contract of carriage attended by bad faith. The trial court ruled in their favor, and the Court of Appeals affirmed with modifications. The Supreme Court ultimately restored the awards for moral and exemplary damages.

The Issue Before the Court

The central question was whether the bus company was liable for the lost luggage and whether its conduct warranted moral and exemplary damages. The company argued that Fatima never declared excess baggage and therefore assumed the risk of loss.

The Ruling: Extraordinary Diligence Required

The Supreme Court rejected the company's defense. Under Article 1733 of the Civil Code, common carriers must observe extraordinary diligence in safeguarding goods transported by them. This duty lasts from the moment goods are received until they are delivered to the rightful recipient (Article 1736).

The Court found that the loss resulted from the company's negligence—the baggage compartment doors were not securely fastened. The fact that the company's own employee helped load the bags without requiring a declaration or receipt strengthened the passenger's case. As the Court of Appeals observed, the carrier's failure to collect freight charges was its own lookout.

Bad Faith and Damages

The Court reinstated the awards for moral and exemplary damages, finding that the company's conduct—from the initial paltry offer to the prolonged inaction—constituted bad faith. The respondents had to travel between Bicol and Manila, report to the NBI and police, and even execute affidavits of loss to reconstitute documents.

The final awards were:

• P30,000 for lost items
• P30,000 for transportation expenses
• P20,000 for moral damages
• P5,000 for exemplary damages
• P5,000 for attorney's fees

Practical Takeaways

• Extraordinary diligence is the standard for common carriers and similar businesses handling customers' property. Ordinary care is not enough.
• Bad faith triggers moral damages. When a company acts with gross negligence or deliberate indifference, courts may award moral damages for mental anguish and emotional suffering.
• Exemplary damages punish and deter. Courts award these to set an example and discourage similar conduct in the future.
• Documentation matters. The respondents' thorough record-keeping—police reports, NBI filings, and written demands—helped establish their claim.
• A company cannot hide behind technicalities. Failure to issue receipts or collect fees does not absolve a carrier of responsibility when it accepted the goods.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a lawyer or ask ASG Legal AI.