From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 217–222 of 222 articles for “checks”

Liability for Dishonored Checks: When Civil Damages Can Be Recovered

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when a party can recover civil damages from a check issuer even if criminal liability under B.P. 22 is not established.

When Courts Lack Jurisdiction Over Bouncing Checks Cases: The Rosa Uy Ruling

The Supreme Court clarifies territorial jurisdiction rules for B.P. 22 cases and when lack of jurisdiction can still be raised.

Territorial Jurisdiction and Bouncing Checks Law: Where Can You Be Sued

The Supreme Court explains where a B.P. 22 bouncing checks case may be filed, based on territorial jurisdiction rules.

Bouncing Checks and Continuous Crimes: Understanding Jurisdiction in BP 22 Cases

Learn how the Supreme Court treats multiple bouncing check violations as continuous crimes affecting jurisdiction in Philippine law.

Bouncing Checks and Estafa: When a Dishonored Check Is Not Fraud

The Supreme Court clarifies when issuing a bouncing check constitutes estafa versus a mere violation of the Bouncing Checks Law.

Bouncing Checks Law: Corporate Officers Personally Liable for Signed Checks

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on BP 22: corporate officers who sign bouncing checks face personal criminal liability, even if signed in blank.