Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
When Circumstantial Evidence Justifies Dismissal for Fraud Against the Company
Philippine Airlines v. NLRC shows when circumstantial evidence suffices to prove employee fraud justifying dismissal for loss of trust.
Circumstantial Evidence in Robbery With Homicide: When Conviction Stands Beyond Reasonable Doubt
The Supreme Court explains when circumstantial evidence suffices to convict for robbery with homicide, and why flight and unexplained absence signal guilt.
Circumstantial Evidence and Eyewitness Testimony in Rape of a Minor: People v. Torejos
The Supreme Court affirms a death sentence for rape of a three-year-old, clarifying evidentiary rules on witness credibility and circumstantial proof.
Circumstantial Evidence and Conviction: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Homicide Cases
How the Supreme Court upheld a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence, explaining the rules on conspiracy, treachery, and damages.
Circumstantial Evidence and Conspiracy: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Murder Cases
How the Supreme Court upheld a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence and conspiracy, explaining the rules for proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Treachery and Witness Credibility: Proving Murder Beyond Reasonable Doubt
How the Supreme Court weighed witness credibility, treachery, and circumstantial evidence in affirming a murder conviction with modifications.
Unseen Crimes, Unshakable Justice: How Circumstantial Evidence Convicts in Rape-Homicide Cases
The Supreme Court explains how circumstantial evidence can prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in rape-homicide cases, as shown in People v. Dizon.
Proving Guilt Beyond Doubt: How Circumstantial Evidence Works in Philippine Robbery with Homicide Cases
Philippine Supreme Court explains when circumstantial evidence suffices to convict for robbery with homicide, and why alibi fails.
Alibi and Denial in Philippine Criminal Cases: Lessons from People v. Raganas
Why alibi and denial rarely convince Philippine courts, explained through People v. Raganas, a robbery with homicide case built on circumstantial evidence.
When Silence Condemns: The Decisive Role of Circumstantial Evidence in Philippine Robbery Homicide Cases
How the Supreme Court upheld a robbery-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence, not direct testimony, in People v. Raganas.
Circumstantial Evidence in Philippine Criminal Law: When Is It Enough for Conviction
When can Philippine courts convict based on circumstantial evidence? Learn the rules and limits from People v. Apelado.
How Circumstantial Evidence Can Convict: Lessons from People v. Ortiz
Philippine courts can convict on circumstantial evidence alone if it forms an unbroken chain proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Unseen Crimes Unquestionable Guilt: How Circumstantial Evidence Convicts in Philippine Parricide Cases
A look at People v. Suelto, where the Supreme Court upheld a parricide conviction based on circumstantial evidence, not eyewitness testimony.
Proving Murder Without a Body: Conspiracy and Circumstantial Evidence in Philippine Law
The Supreme Court affirms murder convictions despite no body found, explaining how conspiracy and circumstantial evidence can prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Beyond Eyewitnesses: How Philippine Courts Use Circumstantial Evidence to Secure Convictions
Philippine courts can convict based on circumstantial evidence when it forms an unbroken chain. Learn how in People v. De los Santos.
Child Abuse Convictions Upheld: Parricide and Homicide in the Cariquez Case
The Supreme Court affirms parricide and homicide convictions of a mother and her partner for the fatal abuse of a 2-year-old child, clarifying key rules on circumstantial evidence and penalties.
Robbery with Homicide: When Circumstantial Evidence and Voluntary Confessions Convict
The Supreme Court affirms a robbery-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence and voluntary admissions to a confidant, not custodial interrogation.
Circumstantial Evidence and Confessions to Confidants: Robbery with Homicide Conviction
The Supreme Court affirms a robbery-with-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence and voluntary admissions to a trusted police officer.
Unseen Eyes Unspoken Truths: How Circumstantial Evidence Convicts in Philippine Rape-Homicide Cases
The Supreme Court explains when circumstantial evidence suffices to convict for rape with homicide, using the 1999 Bantilan case.
Positive Identification in Philippine Kidnapping Cases: Why Witness Testimony Matters
Philippine courts rely on positive identification and circumstantial evidence to convict in serious crimes. Learn how witness testimony shapes outcomes.
Proving Guilt Beyond Doubt: How Circumstantial Evidence Works in Philippine Criminal Law
Philippine Supreme Court explains how a lone eyewitness's positive identification outweighs alibi in murder convictions.
Reasonable Doubt and Circumstantial Evidence: Safeguarding Justice in Philippine Courts
How the Supreme Court acquitted a rape-homicide accused, stressing that circumstantial evidence must produce conviction beyond reasonable doubt.
Unseen Evidence Unquestionable Guilt How Philippine Courts Convict on Circumstantial Proof in Murder Cases
Philippine courts can convict on circumstantial evidence alone if it forms an unbroken chain pointing to guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Conviction on Circumstantial Evidence: Lessons from People v. Sison on Witness Credibility in Philippine Crimi
The Supreme Court affirms a homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence and credible witness testimony, clarifying the rules on state witnesses and evident premeditation.