From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 289–298 of 298 articles for “circumstantial evidence”

Circumstantial Evidence Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Philippine Courts

When can circumstantial evidence convict? The Supreme Court explains the unbroken chain rule in People v. Sumaoy.

Conspiracy and Circumstantial Evidence: When Is It Enough for Conviction

The Supreme Court clarifies when circumstantial evidence and conspiracy can—and cannot—support a criminal conviction beyond reasonable doubt.

Circumstantial Evidence and Reasonable Doubt Protecting the Accused in Philippine Law

How Philippine courts weigh circumstantial evidence and reasonable doubt to protect the accused, explained through a landmark rape case.

When Can Circumstantial Evidence Lead to a Murder Conviction in the Philippines

Learn when Philippine courts accept circumstantial evidence to convict for murder, the legal rules, and practical takeaways.

Circumstantial Evidence in Rape Cases: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

How the Supreme Court upheld a rape-homicide conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence, and what this means for Philippine criminal prosecutions.

When Circumstantial Evidence Suffices: Rape with Homicide and the Limits of Alibi

The Supreme Court explains when circumstantial evidence can convict, why alibi rarely works, and the difference between reclusion perpetua and life imprisonment.

Carnapping With Homicide: Liability and Circumstantial Evidence in Philippine Law

How the Supreme Court upheld a carnapping-with-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence, explaining liability rules under RA 6539.

Circumstantial Evidence Proving Guilt Beyond A Reasonable Doubt in Philippine Courts

How Philippine courts use circumstantial evidence to convict beyond reasonable doubt, explained through People v. Danao.

When Can Eyewitness Testimony Alone Convict in the Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court explains when circumstantial evidence, not just eyewitness testimony, can convict an accused beyond reasonable doubt.

Conspiracy and Drug Transportation: What Philippine Law Requires

How the Supreme Court upheld a drug conspiracy conviction based on circumstantial evidence and the act of transporting heroin.