Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Rape Conviction Affirmed: Force, Intimidation, and Carnal Knowledge in Philippine Law
The Supreme Court clarifies force, intimidation, and carnal knowledge in rape under RA 8353, affirming a conviction.
Rape Conviction Affirmed: The Legal Threshold for Carnal Knowledge and Victim Credibility
The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction, clarifying that slight penetration of the labia suffices for carnal knowledge and that a credible victim's testimony alone can convict.
Rape Conviction Stands Despite Initial Charge of Forcible Abduction
Supreme Court rules forcible abduction is absorbed in rape when the intent is carnal knowledge, affirming conviction.
Incestuous Rape: Consummation vs Attempt and Proving Carnal Knowledge Beyond Reasonable Doubt
The Supreme Court distinguishes consummated from attempted incestuous rape, stressing the prosecution's burden to prove carnal knowledge beyond reasonable doubt.
Rape Conviction Upheld Despite Inconsistencies in Victim's Testimony
Philippine Supreme Court affirms rape conviction, explaining why minor inconsistencies in testimony don't destroy credibility and what constitutes carnal knowledge.
Rape Conviction Upheld: Penetration of Labia Minora Constitutes Carnal Knowledge
Supreme Court clarifies that penetration of the labia minora, even without full vaginal entry, satisfies the carnal knowledge requirement for rape.
Rape Charge Reduced to Acts of Lasciviousness Under the Child Abuse Law
When the prosecution failed to prove carnal knowledge, the Supreme Court convicted the accused of acts of lasciviousness under the Child Abuse Law instead of rape.
Defining Acts of Lasciviousness: Why Intent and Proof Matter in Sexual Abuse Cases
In a 2002 ruling, the Supreme Court downgraded rape charges to acts of lasciviousness after finding the evidence insufficient to prove carnal knowledge.
Rape Conviction Hinges on Specific Allegations Protecting Due Process in Criminal Law
The Supreme Court acquits a father of rape because the prosecution failed to prove carnal knowledge and unconsciousness as specifically alleged.
The Line Between Consensual Act and Rape: Establishing Carnal Knowledge Beyond Reasonable Doubt
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies what constitutes consummated rape, the proof required for conviction, and when the death penalty applies.
Rape vs Acts of Lasciviousness: Proving the Crime Beyond Reasonable Doubt
How Philippine courts distinguish rape from acts of lasciviousness and what evidence proves carnal knowledge beyond reasonable doubt.
Rape Conviction Affirmed: Standing Position and Credibility in Philippine Courts
Supreme Court affirms rape conviction, ruling carnal knowledge can occur in any position and a credible victim's testimony suffices for conviction.
Child Rape in the Philippines: What People v. Lomerio Teaches About Credible Testimony
A Philippine Supreme Court ruling on convicting a child rapist on the victim's testimony, the meaning of carnal knowledge, and how aggravating circumstances are weighed.
Statutory Rape Conviction Upheld Despite Lack of Physical Evidence
The Supreme Court affirms a statutory rape conviction, ruling that an intact hymen and lack of physical injuries do not negate carnal knowledge.
Rape Conviction Requires Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Lessons from People v. Masalihit
Philippine Supreme Court acquits father in rape case, emphasizing that carnal knowledge must be proven beyond reasonable doubt, not inferred.
Rape of a Mentally Retarded Person: Consent and Legal Consequences in the Philippines
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that carnal knowledge of a mentally retarded woman whose mental age is below twelve constitutes rape.
Rape of a Person Deprived of Reason: Consent and Mental Capacity in Philippine Law
Philippine law treats carnal knowledge of a woman deprived of reason as rape, regardless of apparent consent. This case explains why.