From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 25–33 of 33 articles for “carnapping”

Carnapping Conviction Valid Even Without Extrajudicial Confessions: Circumstantial Evidence Suffices

Conviction for carnapping with homicide can rest on circumstantial evidence even when confessions are thrown out. Learn the rules.

Conviction Upheld on Circumstantial Evidence in Carnapping-Murder Case

The Supreme Court explains when circumstantial evidence suffices for conviction and why unproven aggravating circumstances mean reclusion perpetua, not death.

Accountability for All: Conspiracy in Carnapping with Homicide

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on conspiracy in carnapping with homicide, explaining how circumstantial evidence can prove joint criminal liability.

Intent to Gain in Carnapping and Liability Through Criminal Conspiracy

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on intent to gain in carnapping, conspiracy liability, and penalties under the Anti-Carnapping Act.

Homicide vs Robbery With Homicide: Distinguishing Intent and Proving the Crime

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when robbery with homicide stands, when it falls to homicide, and how intent to gain is proven in carnapping.

Circumstantial Evidence in Carnapping with Homicide: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

How the Supreme Court upheld a carnapping conviction based on circumstantial evidence, explaining the rules on identification, alibi, and damages.

Consent and Carnapping: When Initial Permission Negates Criminal Intent

The Supreme Court explains when initial consent to take a car negates unlawful taking, the core element of carnapping.

Conspiracy in Philippine Criminal Law: How Group Actions Lead to Collective Liability for Carnapping and Murde

The Supreme Court explains how conspiracy makes each member of a group equally liable for crimes committed during a joint criminal enterprise.

Carnapping With Homicide: Liability and Circumstantial Evidence in Philippine Law

How the Supreme Court upheld a carnapping-with-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence, explaining liability rules under RA 6539.