Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
When a Barangay Captain Cannot Be Independent Counsel: Extrajudicial Confessions and the Constitution
A barangay captain who is a lawyer cannot act as independent counsel for a suspect. The Supreme Court explains why the confession was inadmissible.
Silence Isnt Always Golden: Admissibility of Confessions in Philippine Homicide Cases
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on extrajudicial admissions, hearsay, and circumstantial evidence in homicide prosecutions.
Confessions and the Death Penalty: Ensuring Voluntariness in Rape-Homicide Cases
The Supreme Court affirms a death sentence for rape-homicide, explaining the required "searching inquiry" into guilty pleas and the weight of voluntary confessions.
Confession Without Counsel Inadmissibility AND Protection OF Constitutional Rights IN Theft Cases
Supreme Court acquits four in qualified theft case after ruling that confessions taken without effective counsel and evidence from an unlawful arrest are inadmissible.
Confessions AND Constitutional Rights Safeguarding THE Accused IN Robbery With Homicide Cases
Confessions and Counsel: Protecting Rights During Custodial Investigation
A Supreme Court ruling shows why a confession obtained without truly effective counsel is inadmissible, and what this means for suspects and police.
Uncorroborated Confession and Doubts in Murder Cases: When Courts Order Acquittal
Learn when Philippine courts order acquittal in murder cases despite confessions, and why corroboration and reasonable doubt matter.
Guilt Beyond Silence: How Confessions to Friends Can Seal Your Fate in Philippine Courts
A Supreme Court ruling shows that admitting a crime to a friend can be used as evidence against you in Philippine courts.
Conspiracy and Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Direct Evidence in Robbery With Homicide Cases
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on conspiracy, hearsay, and extrajudicial confessions in robbery with homicide cases, explaining why the accused was acquitted.
Confessions AND Corroboration Ensuring Justice IN Rape With Homicide Cases
Carnapping With Homicide: Conspiracy and Admissibility of Extrajudicial Confessions
Explaining the Supreme Court ruling on carnapping with homicide, conspiracy among co-accused, and when extrajudicial confessions to private persons are admissible.
Eyewitness Testimony, Confessions, and Conspiracy: Lessons from the Payumo Massacre Case
The Supreme Court's ruling in the Payumo Massacre case clarifies the rules on eyewitness credibility, inadmissible confessions, and conspiracy in Philippine criminal law.
Uncounseled Confessions and the Right to Silence: Protecting Due Process in Philippine Criminal Law
The Supreme Court clarifies when uncounseled confessions are inadmissible and why timely objections matter in Philippine criminal procedure.
Safeguarding Confessions: The Right to Competent Counsel in Philippine Law
A confession is inadmissible if the accused lacked truly competent, independent counsel during custodial investigation.
Confessions and Constitutional Rights: Safeguarding Justice in Custodial Investigations
The Supreme Court acquits an accused in a rape-homicide case, ruling that confessions obtained without counsel and circumstantial evidence are insufficient for conviction.
Independent Counsel Requirement in Custodial Investigation: The Velarde Case
A mayor acting as counsel during custodial investigation is not independent, making confessions inadmissible and leading to acquittal.
Carnapping and Homicide: Conviction Through Circumstantial Evidence and Admissible Confessions
The Supreme Court explains how circumstantial evidence and admissions to private persons can establish guilt in carnapping and homicide cases.
Improvident Plea AND Admissibility OF Extrajudicial Confessions IN Rape With Homicide Cases
Acquittal in Rape With Homicide: When Reasonable Doubt Prevails
The Supreme Court acquitted Antonio Silvano of rape with homicide, showing why hearsay confessions and weak circumstantial evidence cannot sustain a conviction.
Extrajudicial Confessions and Circumstantial Evidence in Philippine Criminal Cases
Learn when an alleged confession to a private person is admissible and why circumstantial evidence must form an unbroken chain to convict.
Confessions and Constitutional Rights: How Philippine Courts Balance Justice and Due Process in Criminal Cases
The Supreme Court clarifies when extrajudicial confessions are admissible and how circumstantial evidence can sustain a conviction in rape with homicide.
Confessions and Constitutional Rights: Voluntary Statements vs Custodial Interrogation
Philippine Supreme Court explains when a confession is admissible and when custodial interrogation rights apply, using a rape-homicide case.
Confessions and Constitutional Rights: Ensuring Voluntariness and Competent Counsel in Philippine Law
A Supreme Court ruling on when extrajudicial confessions are admissible, focusing on voluntariness and the right to competent and independent counsel.
Confessions and Circumstantial Evidence Establishing Guilt Without Direct Proof
How Philippine courts weigh eyewitness testimony, alibi, and circumstantial evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.