From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 25–48 of 72 articles for “psychological abuse”

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: Proving Social Media Authorship and Higher Penalties

Supreme Court clarifies how to prove social media authorship in VAWC cases and rules that using Facebook raises the penalty under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: Higher Penalty for ICT Use

Supreme Court raises penalty for psychological abuse committed via Facebook, ruling ICT use qualifies for one-degree higher punishment under RA 10175.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: Proving Social Media Authorship and Higher Penalties

Supreme Court clarifies how to prove social media authorship in VAWC psychological abuse cases and applies higher cybercrime penalties.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: Higher Penalties for Social Media Offenses

Supreme Court clarifies that using Facebook to commit psychological abuse under RA 9262 warrants a higher penalty under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

When Social Media Abuse Raises the Penalty Under RA 9262 and the Cybercrime Law

The Supreme Court clarifies when using Facebook to commit psychological abuse triggers a higher penalty under RA 9262 and RA 10175.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: What the Supreme Court Ruling Means

The Supreme Court clarifies when Facebook posts constitute psychological abuse under RA 9262 and how ICT use raises the penalty.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: When Facebook Posts Lead to Higher Penalties

The Supreme Court clarifies how social media authorship is proven and why ICT use raises penalties for psychological abuse under RA 9262.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: Higher Penalty for Social Media Offenses

Supreme Court rules that using social media to commit psychological abuse under RA 9262 warrants a higher penalty under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: When Facebook Posts Become Crimes

The Supreme Court clarifies when Facebook posts constitute psychological abuse under RA 9262 and how ICT use raises penalties.

Online Psychological Abuse and Higher Penalties: Demaala v. Sandiganbayan

The Supreme Court clarifies when Facebook posts constitute psychological abuse under RA 9262 and why using ICT raises the penalty.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: When Facebook Posts Lead to Higher Penalties

The Supreme Court clarifies how social media posts can prove psychological abuse under RA 9262 and why using Facebook raises the penalty.

When a Facebook Post Becomes a Crime: Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262

The Supreme Court clarifies when social media posts constitute psychological abuse under RA 9262 and how authorship may be proven.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: When a Public Facebook Post Becomes a Crime

The Supreme Court affirms that public Facebook posts can constitute psychological abuse under RA 9262, with higher penalties for ICT use.

Psychological Abuse via Facebook Conviction Upheld with Higher Cybercrime Penalty

Supreme Court affirms conviction for psychological abuse via Facebook posts, imposing higher penalty under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: Proving Social Media Authorship and Higher Penalties

The Supreme Court clarifies how to prove social media authorship in VAWC cases and raises penalties when psychological abuse is committed online.

Online Psychological Abuse and Higher Penalties for ICT Use in VAWC Cases

Supreme Court clarifies how social media authorship is proven and raises penalties when VAWC crimes use ICT.

Online Psychological Abuse Under VAWC: Higher Penalty When Committed Through Social Media

Supreme Court clarifies that using Facebook to commit psychological abuse under RA 9262 warrants a higher penalty under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: Proving Facebook Post Authorship and Higher Penalties

The Supreme Court clarifies how to prove Facebook post authorship in VAWC cases and applies higher cybercrime penalties for online psychological abuse.

Psychological Abuse via Facebook: Higher Penalty When ICT Is Used

The Supreme Court explains when a public Facebook post amounts to psychological abuse under RA 9262 and why ICT use raises the penalty.

When Social Media Abuse Qualifies for Higher Penalties Under Philippine Law

The Supreme Court clarifies how Facebook posts can prove psychological abuse under RA 9262 and why ICT use raises the penalty.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: When a Public Facebook Post Becomes a Crime

The Supreme Court clarifies how public social media posts can constitute psychological abuse under RA 9262, and when using ICT raises the penalty.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: When Facebook Posts Lead to Higher Penalties

The Supreme Court clarifies how social media posts can prove psychological abuse under RA 9262 and why ICT use raises the penalty.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: When a Public Facebook Post Leads to a Higher Penalty

The Supreme Court clarifies how social media posts can prove psychological abuse under RA 9262 and why using Facebook raises the penalty.

Online Psychological Abuse and Higher Penalties Under RA 9262 and the Cybercrime Law

The Supreme Court affirms a conviction for online psychological abuse under RA 9262 and raises the penalty because the offense was committed through Facebook.