From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 25–48 of 99 articles for “refund claims”

VAT Refund Claims: Why the 120-Day Rule Is Jurisdictional and Deadlines Matter

Learn how the Supreme Court's ruling in Aichi Forging clarifies the mandatory 120-day VAT refund waiting period and its impact on taxpayers.

Premature Filing of VAT Refund Claims: Strict Adherence to the 120-Day Rule

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the mandatory 120-day period for VAT refund claims and the consequences of premature filing.

Equitable Estoppel and Tax Refund Claims: The Exception to the 120+30-Day Rule

Explains the Supreme Court's ruling in Visayas Geothermal Power Co. v. CIR, applying equitable estoppel to the 120+30-day tax refund rule.

Reckoning the Two-Year Prescriptive Period for DST Refund Claims: PBCom v. CIR

When does the two-year prescriptive period for a documentary stamp tax refund claim begin for metering machine users? The Supreme Court settles the rule.

Untimely Tax Refund Claims: The Mandatory 120+30 Day Rule

Why filing a VAT refund case before the 120-day period expires can cost a taxpayer everything, even a valid claim.

Equitable Estoppel in VAT Refund Claims: Protection Against BIR Rulings

The Supreme Court protects taxpayers who relied on BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03, allowing premature VAT refund claims during the window period.

VAT Refund Claims: The 120-Day Rule, Equitable Estoppel, and the San Roque Window

The Supreme Court clarifies when a premature VAT refund claim may still prosper under the San Roque doctrine and equitable estoppel.

Local Tax Refund Claims: Timeliness and Jurisdiction Under Section 195 LGC

Strict deadlines and the right court matter in local tax refund claims. China Banking Corp. v. City Treasurer of Manila explains why.

VAT Refund Denials: Why "Zero-Rated" Must Appear on Invoices

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on VAT refund claims: strict invoicing rules, including the "zero-rated" imprint, determine success.

Understanding Documentary Stamp Tax on Trust Agreements: Insights from a Landmark Philippine Case

A Philippine Supreme Court ruling clarifies when documentary stamp tax applies to trust agreements and the evidence needed for tax refund claims.

Untimely VAT Refund Claims Strict Adherence To Prescriptive Periods

The Supreme Court clarifies strict prescriptive periods for VAT refund claims, denying Northern Mindanao Power Corporation's petition for late and premature filings.

Tax Refund Claims: Proving Excess Creditable Withholding Tax Without Quarterly ITRs

Supreme Court rules quarterly ITRs of succeeding year are not indispensable in proving excess creditable withholding tax refund claims.

Equitable Estoppel and Tax Refund Claims: Understanding the San Roque Exception

The Supreme Court clarifies when taxpayers may file judicial VAT refund claims without waiting 120 days, citing equitable estoppel.

Equitable Estoppel in VAT Refund Claims: When Taxpayers Can Bypass the 120-Day Rule

The Supreme Court clarifies when taxpayers may file VAT refund claims with the CTA without waiting for the 120-day period.

The 120-Day Rule and Equitable Estoppel in VAT Refund Claims

Understand the 120-day VAT refund rule, its exceptions, and how equitable estoppel protects taxpayers who filed judicial claims early.

VAT Refund Claims: Equitable Estoppel and Strict Interpretation of Tax Laws

Supreme Court ruling on VAT refund claims, transitional input tax credits, and the strict interpretation of tax laws in Fort Bonifacio Development Corporation v. CIR.

VAT Refund Claims: Strict Deadlines and Proper Documentation Required

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies VAT refund rules: strict 2-year filing deadlines and the necessity of official receipts for zero-rated services.

Strict Deadlines in VAT Refund Claims: The 120+30 Day Rule and Its Exceptions

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the mandatory 120+30 day periods for VAT refund claims, and the BIR ruling that temporarily allowed premature judicial appeals.

Navigating VAT Refund Timelines: How Premature Filing Can Still Succeed Under Equitable Estoppel

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when premature VAT refund claims may still prosper under equitable estoppel from BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03.

Unraveling Tax Refund Claims: The Weight of Withholding Tax Certificates

The Supreme Court clarifies when creditable withholding tax certificates suffice to prove a tax refund claim, and why actual remittance need not be shown.

VAT Refund Claims Substantiation AND Timeliness IN Zero Rated Sales

Strict 120+30 Day Rule for VAT Refund Claims in the Philippines

Learn the mandatory 120+30 day periods for VAT refund claims and why late judicial appeals are fatal under Philippine tax law.

Strict Compliance: The Mandatory Nature of VAT Refund Periods Under the NIRC

The Supreme Court rules that the 120+30 day periods for VAT refund claims are mandatory and jurisdictional, dismissing a belated judicial claim.

Untimely Appeal Strict Deadlines For VAT Refund Claims In The Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the mandatory 120-day and 30-day deadlines for VAT refund claims, including the exception for premature judicial filings.