From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–24 of 99 articles for “refund claims”

Proving Income Declaration for Creditable Withholding Tax Refunds in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies how taxpayers can prove income declaration for creditable withholding tax refund claims, easing documentary requirements.

Unlocking VAT Refunds for Zero-Rated Sales: The Attributability Requirement in Philippine Tax Law

The Supreme Court clarifies that input VAT need not be directly and entirely attributable to zero-rated sales for refund claims, easing the path for VAT-registered taxpayers.

Retroactivity of Tax Rulings Clarifying Documentary Stamp Tax on Intercompany Advances

Supreme Court clarifies when tax rulings apply retroactively, affecting documentary stamp tax on intercompany advances and refund claims.

VAT Refund Claims: Complete Documents and Zero-Rated Sales Requirements

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies VAT refund rules on complete documents, zero-rated sales proof, and input tax computation for taxpayers.

VAT Refund Claims: The Mandatory 120+30 Day Rule in the Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court affirms that the 120+30 day rule for VAT refund claims is mandatory and jurisdictional. Learn the deadlines and exceptions.

VAT Refund Claims: Establishing Zero-Rated Sales as a Prerequisite

The Supreme Court clarifies that unutilized input VAT refunds under Section 112(A) require proof of zero-rated sales in the same taxable period.

Navigating Tax Refund Deadlines: The 120-Day Rule and Its Window Period Exception

Learn how the Supreme Court clarified the 120+30 day rule for VAT refund claims and the window period exception under BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03.

VAT Refund Claims: The Window Period Exception to the 120-Day Rule

Learn how the Supreme Court applied the window period exception in VAT refund claims, allowing taxpayers to file judicial claims without waiting for the 120-day period.

Tax Refund Claims: Why Judicial Claims Stand Independently of Administrative Proceedings

The Supreme Court clarifies that a judicial tax refund claim before the CTA is not precluded by defects in the administrative claim filed with the BIR.

Navigating VAT Refund Claims: Due Process in Philippine Tax Courts

Learn how the Supreme Court protects taxpayers' due process rights in VAT refund claims, from the 120-day rule to document submission standards.

Understanding Retroactive Application of Regulatory Resolutions Impact on Electric Cooperatives in the Philipp

This article explains the Supreme Court's ruling on the 120-day period for VAT refund claims and how BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 affects electric cooperatives and taxpayers.

Navigating Tax Refund Claims: The Two-Year Rule and Its Implications for Businesses in the Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the two-year prescriptive period for tax refund claims, allowing judicial claims even without the BIR's prior ruling.

Navigating VAT Refund Claims: Understanding the Critical Timelines and Exceptions

Learn the strict 120+30 day rules for VAT refund claims in the Philippines, plus the key exception that saved this taxpayer's case.

Unlocking Tax Refunds: How the Supreme Court's Ruling on VAT Compliance Impacts Businesses in the Philippines

A guide to the Supreme Court's ruling on VAT refund claims, tax compliance, and what it means for Philippine businesses.

Unlocking the Timeline for VAT Refund Claims: A Guide to Navigating Tax Refund Procedures in the Philippines

Learn how the Supreme Court clarified the 120-day and 30-day periods for VAT refund claims, and what documents prove zero-rated sales.

Forest Charges and Tax Refunds: Jurisdiction and Prescription in Philippine Tax Law

A 2019 Supreme Court ruling clarifies that forest charges are internal revenue taxes, so refund claims must go to the CIR within two years.

Tax Refund Claims: Filing on Time Beats Waiting for BIR Action

Supreme Court clarifies taxpayers may file judicial tax refund claims before the BIR acts, provided the two-year prescriptive period is respected.

Tax Refund Claims: Timely Filing and the Commissioner's Inaction

The Supreme Court clarifies when taxpayers may seek judicial tax refund claims despite the Commissioner's inaction, and the two-year prescriptive period.

Proof in Tax Refund Claims: Annual ITR Suffices, Quarterly Returns Not Mandatory

The Supreme Court clarifies that presenting quarterly ITRs is not required to prove a claim for refund of excess creditable withholding taxes.

VAT Refund Claims Navigating THE Timelines FOR Zero Rated Sales Under Philippine LAW

VAT Refund Claims: Proving Zero-Rated Sales of Services with Official Receipts

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that VAT official receipts are indispensable to substantiate zero-rated sales of services in refund claims.

Tax Refund Claims: When Remittance Proof Isn't Required for Exempt Taxpayers

Philippine Airlines' tax refund case clarifies when proof of remittance is needed and how CTA reviews administrative claims.

Untangling VAT Refund Claims Navigating Deadlines for Zero-Rated Sales

Learn how the Supreme Court clarified the mandatory deadlines for VAT refund claims on zero-rated sales, and why missing them is fatal.

Equitable Estoppel in VAT Refund Claims: Protecting Taxpayers From Conflicting BIR Rulings

The Supreme Court shields taxpayers who relied on BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 from premature VAT refund dismissals through equitable estoppel.