Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and the Presumption of Innocence in Philippine Criminal Law
The Supreme Court acquits three men convicted of robbery with homicide, ruling that inconsistent eyewitness testimony cannot overcome the presumption of innocence.
The Power of Eyewitness Testimony in Philippine Robbery with Homicide Cases
How positive eyewitness identification overcomes alibi and denial in robbery with homicide prosecutions, as shown in People v. Carugal.
Conspiracy in Robbery With Homicide: Understanding Collective Liability in Philippine Law
A Philippine Supreme Court ruling explains how conspiracy makes every participant liable for robbery with homicide, even if only one stabbed the victim.
Why Alibi Often Fails in Philippine Robbery With Homicide Cases
The Supreme Court explains why alibi is a weak defense when eyewitnesses positively identify the accused in robbery with homicide cases.
When Duty Turns Deadly: Examining the Limits of Police Use of Force in the Philippines
Philippine law allows police to use deadly force only as a last resort. This article explains the legal boundaries, justified homicide, and accountability.
Homicide vs Robbery With Homicide: Distinguishing Intent and Proving the Crime
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when robbery with homicide stands, when it falls to homicide, and how intent to gain is proven in carnapping.
Homicide vs Murder: Understanding the Crucial Difference in Philippine Law
Learn how Philippine law distinguishes homicide from murder, the role of qualifying circumstances, and why the distinction matters in criminal cases.
The Weight of Eyewitness Testimony in Robbery Homicide Cases: A Philippine Supreme Court Analysis
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies how courts weigh eyewitness testimony, alibi, and treachery in murder cases, using People v. Bergonio.
Self-Defense in the Philippines: When Killing in the Heat of the Moment Becomes Homicide
Understand when a killing in the Philippines is homicide, not murder, and why self-defense requires proof of unlawful aggression.
Reckless Actions Deadly Outcomes Establishing Guilt IN Robbery With Homicide Cases
Explore how Philippine courts assess reckless conduct and establish guilt in robbery with homicide cases, with practical legal insights.
When Silence Implies Guilt: Co-Conspirator Testimony in Robbery with Homicide
The Supreme Court explains when a co-conspirator's uncorroborated testimony can convict in robbery with homicide cases.
Frustrated Murder vs Homicide: The Decisive Role of Premeditation in Philippine Law
When does a killing become murder? The Supreme Court explains why evident premeditation is essential and how its absence downgrades frustrated murder to homicide.
Unseen Eyes Unquestionable Guilt How Circumstantial Evidence Convicts In Philippine Robbery Homicide Cases
Philippine courts explain how circumstantial evidence can prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in robbery-homicide cases, with practical guidance for litigants.
Homicide vs Murder: Why Eyewitness Accounts Matter in Proving Treachery
When a lone eyewitness fails to see how an attack began, treachery cannot be presumed—only homicide, not murder, results.
Unbroken Chains: How Circumstantial Evidence Proves Guilt in Philippine Robbery Homicide Cases
A robbery-homicide conviction upheld on circumstantial evidence alone. Learn the rules of proof and what constitutes an unbroken chain of circumstances.
Self-Defense in the Philippines: Understanding the Requisites for Justifiable Homicide
Learn the three requisites for self-defense in Philippine law, who bears the burden of proof, and how courts test claims of unlawful aggression.
Navigating Robbery With Homicide: The Perils of Indivisible Penalties
A look at People v. Pedroso, explaining robbery with homicide elements and the correct application of indivisible penalties.
Accountability for Homicide: Voluntary Surrender as a Mitigating Circumstance in a Stabbing Case
The Supreme Court explains when voluntary surrender mitigates homicide and why a fleeing co-accused may be acquitted.
Murder or Homicide: Understanding Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law
The Supreme Court clarifies when treachery qualifies killing as murder, using the Antonio v. People case as a guide.
Reasonable Doubt Acquittal in Robbery With Homicide: When Weak Evidence Fails
Supreme Court acquits robbery-with-homicide accused where eyewitness testimony lacked specificity and conspiracy was not proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Circumstantial Evidence in Carnapping with Homicide: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt
How the Supreme Court upheld a carnapping conviction based on circumstantial evidence, explaining the rules on identification, alibi, and damages.
Accountability in Conspiracy: Establishing Homicide Liability in Philippine Law
How Philippine courts infer conspiracy from concerted acts, and why each conspirator is liable for the crimes committed by the group.
Reasonable Doubt and Circumstantial Evidence in Murder Cases: People v. Orcula
When circumstantial evidence fails to prove treachery, a murder conviction may be reduced to homicide. Learn from People v. Orcula.
When Does a Fistfight Turn Into Murder? Understanding Treachery in Philippine Law
The Supreme Court explains when a sudden attack from behind qualifies as treachery, and when it does not, in a Philippine homicide case.