From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 601–624 of 1,793 articles for “evidence”

Challenging Buy-Bust Operations: When Procedural Lapses in Drug Sale Cases Lead to Acquittal

The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect due to unjustified gaps in the chain of custody, underscoring the importance of preserving evidence integrity.

Chain OF Custody IN Drug Cases Safeguarding Evidence Integrity 2

Challenging Drug Convictions: Scrutinizing Police Conduct and Evidence in Illegal Drug Cases

The Supreme Court affirms drug convictions, explaining how courts weigh police testimony, buy-bust operations, and the presumption of regularity.

Circumstantial Evidence in Theft Cases: When It Is Not Enough to Convict

The Supreme Court acquits a theft convict, explaining when circumstantial evidence fails to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Psychological Incapacity and Marriage Nullity: Proving Grave and Incurable Conditions

The Supreme Court clarifies what evidence proves psychological incapacity under Article 36 of the Family Code, requiring grave, incurable, and juridically antecedent conditions.

Grave Misconduct Requires Proof of Wrongful Intent, Not Just a Flawed Revaluation

When is a bad property valuation grave misconduct? The Supreme Court clarifies the evidence needed to hold public officers liable.

Broken Chain of Custody: Safeguarding Drug Evidence Integrity in Philippine Law

Philippine Supreme Court acquits drug suspect due to broken chain of custody, stressing strict evidence integrity rules under RA 9165.

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Integrity of Evidence Prevails

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on chain of custody in drug possession cases, explaining why substantial compliance with Section 21 suffices.

Refund of Excess Withholding Taxes: Proving Entitlement Under Philippine Law

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on refund of excess creditable withholding taxes, the two-year prescriptive period, and evidence required.

Intent to Kill: Distinguishing Attempted Murder From Physical Injuries in Philippine Law

The Supreme Court explains how intent to kill separates attempted murder from physical injuries, and what evidence proves it.

Psychological Incapacity Under Article 36: When Falling Out of Love Is Not Enough

The Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between questions of fact and law in Article 36 nullity cases, and what evidence proves psychological incapacity.

Qualified Theft and Circumstantial Evidence: When Conviction Stands Without Direct Proof

The Supreme Court explains when circumstantial evidence suffices to convict for qualified theft, and how courts fix the value of stolen goods.

Breaking the Chain: Upholding Drug Convictions Despite Minor Procedural Lapses

The Supreme Court clarifies that minor gaps in marking evidence do not break the chain of custody in drug cases, affirming a life sentence.

Upholding Drug Convictions: Integrity of Evidence Despite Procedural Lapses in Chain of Custody

The Supreme Court affirmed a drug conviction despite lapses in the Section 21 inventory and photography requirements, because the chain of custody of the seized shabu remained unbroken.

Intent to Kill: What Separates Frustrated Homicide from Serious Physical Injuries

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies how intent to kill distinguishes frustrated homicide from serious physical injuries, with practical guidance on evidence.

When a Seafarer's Disability Claim Fails: The Weight of Medical Evidence in Philippine Law

The Supreme Court clarifies when a seafarer's disability claim fails, emphasizing the company-designated physician's findings and proper procedure.

Self-Defense and Unlawful Aggression: When a Deadly Response Fails in Homicide Cases

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies self-defense requirements in homicide cases, explaining why unlawful aggression is essential and must be proven with clear evidence.

Protecting Children: Corroborated Testimony and the Crime of Statutory Rape

In People v. Sato, the Supreme Court affirmed a statutory rape conviction based on a child's candid testimony, showing how Philippine courts weigh evidence in child abuse cases.

Text Messages as Evidence in Homicide Cases: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

Learn how Philippine courts treat text messages as evidence in homicide cases and what it takes to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Upholding Warrantless Arrests: The Limits of Challenging Drug Possession Evidence

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when warrantless arrests and seizures in drug cases are valid, and when procedural lapses still allow conviction.

Illegal Search Evidence Inadmissible Even If Illegal Arrest Is Waived

Waiving objection to an illegal arrest does not waive the right against illegal search; seized drugs are inadmissible evidence.

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: How Objections Are Waived

The Supreme Court affirmed a drug conviction despite police lapses in handling evidence, ruling that chain-of-custody objections cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.

Murder with Direct Assault: Supreme Court Affirms Conviction in People v. Estonilo

The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction for Murder with Direct Assault in People v. Estonilo, highlighting the role of circumstantial evidence and the weakness of alibi.

Validity OF BUY Bust Operations Upholding Warrantless Arrests AND Drug Evidence Integrity