From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 49–72 of 293 articles for “court of appeals”

Equitable Justice When Strict Procedural Rules Yield to Substantive Rights in Agrarian Disputes

When the Court of Appeals shortened a filing extension without notice, the Supreme Court ruled procedural rules must not frustrate justice.

Immediate Execution of Ombudsman Decisions: A Guide for Philippine Public Officials

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that Ombudsman suspension orders are immediately executory even pending appeal before the Court of Appeals.

Missed Filing Deadlines in Philippine Courts: Lessons from Barangay Dasmariñas vs. Creative Play Corner School

Learn how strict Philippine court filing deadlines are, and why a missed extension cost Barangay Dasmariñas its case before the Court of Appeals.

Illegal Strike Consequences and Employee Rights: Lessons from Alcantara v. Court of Appeals

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when strikes become illegal, who faces termination, and what reinstatement rights employees retain.

Judicial Seniority in the Court of Appeals: Date of Appointment Controls

The Supreme Court settles how CA justices' seniority is determined—by appointment date, not transmittal or barcode.

When Final Judgments Clash: Upholding the Anti-Graft Law and Defining Usurpation of Judicial Functions in the

A provincial adjudicator ignored a final Court of Appeals ruling, leading to a landmark conviction under the Anti-Graft Law and a clarifying ruling on usurpation of judicial functions.

Certiorari as Substitute for Appeal: Procedural Lapses and Grave Abuse of Discretion in Philippine Courts

When can courts overlook procedural lapses? The Supreme Court clarifies certiorari, Rule 43, and grave abuse of discretion in Go v. Court of Appeals.

When Modified Judgments Can Be Appealed: Protecting Litigants' Rights

Learn when a modified Court of Appeals decision is appealable to the Supreme Court and how litigants' rights are protected in civil procedure.

Appeals From the NWRB: Clarifying Jurisdiction Between the RTC and Court of Appeals

The Supreme Court clarifies that appeals from National Water Resources Board decisions go to the Court of Appeals, not the RTC.

Bail Pending Appeal After Conviction: Why Discretion Is Not Automatic

Explaining the Supreme Court ruling in Leviste v. Court of Appeals on bail pending appeal, judicial discretion, and the limits of certiorari.

Streamlining Justice: When Ombudsman Orders Are Final and Unappealable

Learn when Ombudsman decisions become final and unappealable in administrative cases, and why the Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals.

Ombudsman Decisions and the Limits of Appeal in Administrative Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies when Ombudsman rulings become final and unappealable, and why the Court of Appeals cannot touch a one-month suspension order.

Customs Bonds: Contractual Obligations vs Tax Collection Cases

Supreme Court clarifies that suits on customs bonds are contractual, not tax collection cases, so appeals go to the Court of Appeals.

Judicial Accountability: The Cost of Undue Delay in Resolving Motions

When a Court of Appeals justice sat on a motion for nearly three years, the Supreme Court imposed a fine, reaffirming that judges must decide cases promptly.

Annulment of Judgment in Criminal Cases: Llamas v. Court of Appeals

When can a criminal conviction be annulled? The Supreme Court clarifies Rule 47 applies only to civil cases, not criminal ones.

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in CLOA Cancellation Cases: A Property Law Primer

Learn why a landowner's direct appeal to the Court of Appeals failed in a CLOA cancellation case, and the importance of exhausting administrative remedies.

Hierarchy of Courts: When Direct Resort to the Supreme Court Is Not Allowed

The Supreme Court explains the hierarchy of courts rule and why direct petitions for certiorari must first go to the Court of Appeals.

When Banks Must Answer: BSP Decisions Appealable to Court of Appeals

Explaining the Supreme Court ruling that BSP Monetary Board decisions on bank administrative complaints may be appealed to the Court of Appeals.

Derivative Suits and Venue: Lessons from Hi-Yield Realty v. Court of Appeals

Explaining the Supreme Court's ruling on derivative suit venue, Rule 65 vs. Rule 45, and why certiorari cannot substitute for a lost appeal.

Double Jeopardy and Acquittal: The Grave Threats Case of Tiu v. Court of Appeals

The Supreme Court affirms that an acquittal in a grave threats case bars further prosecution, explaining double jeopardy rules.

When Substantial Justice Prevails Over Late Appeal Briefs: Bigornia v. Court of Appeals

The Supreme Court reinstates an appeal dismissed for a late brief, holding that procedural rules serve—not suppress—substantial justice.

Navigating Investment Incentives: The Finality of BOI Decisions and Appellate Procedure

The Supreme Court ruled that a denial of an income tax holiday by the Board of Investments must be appealed to the Court of Appeals, not the Office of the President.

Preventive Suspension of Public Officials: When a Case Becomes Moot

Explore when a challenge to preventive suspension becomes moot, using the Supreme Court's ruling in Radaza v. Court of Appeals.

Psychological Incapacity and Conjugal Property: Understanding Marital Obligations and Asset Division in Philip

The Supreme Court clarifies when psychological incapacity voids a marriage and how conjugal assets are divided, using Laurena v. Court of Appeals.