From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 49–72 of 132 articles for “partiality”

Sheriffs Impropriety Maintaining Impartiality IN Writ Execution

Judicial Impartiality: When a Judge's Conduct Crosses the Line

A judge's private meeting with a litigant to discuss a pending case violates the Code of Judicial Conduct and erodes public trust.

Voluntary Inhibition of Judges in the Philippines: Impartiality and Public Trust

How Philippine courts handle voluntary inhibition of judges, ensuring impartiality and public trust in the judiciary, with practical guidance.

Judicial Ethics When Personal Vendettas Cloud Impartial Judgment

A look at how the Supreme Court reinforces judicial impartiality and the two-notice rule in dismissals.

Judicial Restraint Maintaining Impartiality AND Temperance IN Judicial Conduct

Sheriffs Duty Upholding Impartiality AND DUE Process IN Execution OF Judgments

Judicial Conduct: Protecting Judges From Baseless Claims and Ensuring Impartiality

The Supreme Court shields judges from baseless administrative suits, fining a complainant P10,000 for filing unfounded charges against a judge.

Judicial Diligence: A Judge's Duty to Verify Records and Uphold Impartiality

The Supreme Court reminds judges to verify records and remain impartial, not merely rely on party submissions.

Judicial Conduct: Upholding Impartiality and Temperance On and Off the Bench

An administrative complaint fails when a judge's challenged orders are judicial in nature and no bad faith is shown — the Supreme Court's 2005 ruling explained.

Bias Claims Against Judges: What Evidence Philippine Courts Require

Supreme Court clarifies the evidentiary standard for proving judicial bias and partiality in administrative complaints against Philippine judges.

Judicial Impartiality Upholding Fair Court Proceedings IN Family Disputes

Judicial Impartiality When Family Ties Conflict With Legal Duty In The Courtroom

A judge who hears a case where his son-in-law appears as counsel violates mandatory disqualification rules, even if the outcome seems fair.

Judicial Ethics and Impartiality: When a Judge's Errors Become Gross Ignorance of the Law

A judge's hasty grant of reinvestigation and dismissal without notice or hearing amounts to gross ignorance of the law, violating judicial ethics.

Judicial Conduct: Negligence, Partiality, and the Appearance of Impropriety

A judge's careless signing of documents and joking remarks can constitute negligence and violate judicial ethics, even without proof of bias.

When a Judge's Private Letter Undermines Judicial Impartiality

Supreme Court reprimands a judge for writing university officials about his wife's cases, violating judicial conduct rules on impartiality.

Judicial Impartiality Ensuring Fairness AND Avoiding Bias IN Legal Proceedings

Judicial Misconduct When Orders Reflect Bias AND Compromise Impartiality

Supreme Court fines judge for gross ignorance, grave misconduct, and bias in issuing irregular orders favoring a party's counsel.

When Judges Face Misconduct Complaints: Proof and Impartiality Standards

Explaining the Supreme Court's dismissal of administrative complaints against a judge and clerk of court for lack of substantial evidence.

Judicial Misconduct When Personal Interest Undermines Impartiality

When a judge becomes a party to cases before his own court, dismissal from service is the fitting penalty.

Judicial Impartiality Ensuring Fairness Despite Procedural Missteps IN Criminal Cases

Judicial Ethics Upholding Impartiality AND DUE Process IN Court Proceedings

When Personal Grievances Cloud Impartiality: The Limits of Contempt Power and Judicial Overreach

A Philippine Supreme Court ruling clarifies when courts may cite for contempt and why personal hostility cannot justify the arbitrary use of judicial power.

Judicial Ethics Upholding Impartiality AND Efficiency IN Court Services

Judicial Impartiality: When a Judge's Questions Are Not Proof of Bias

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that a judge's active questioning during trial does not automatically prove bias or partiality warranting inhibition.