Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Self-Defense and the Burden of Proof: Establishing Unlawful Aggression in Philippine Law
Learn how Philippine courts weigh self-defense claims, the burden to prove unlawful aggression, and why credible evidence matters.
Self-Defense vs. Unlawful Aggression: When a Killing Is Homicide, Not Murder
The Supreme Court explains when a sudden attack is self-defense, and why failure to prove treachery reduces murder to homicide.
The Boundaries of Self Defense When Force Becomes Unlawful Aggression in the Philippines
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when self-defense is valid and when force becomes unlawful aggression in criminal cases.
Self-Defense vs. Unlawful Aggression: When Homicide Is Not Murder in Philippine Law
The Supreme Court clarifies when a killing is homicide, not murder, and why a weak self-defense claim fails in this Philippine case.
Self-Defense in Philippine Law: Clear and Convincing Evidence Required
Learn what Philippine courts require to prove self-defense, why unlawful aggression is indispensable, and how this 2003 ruling applies.
Self-Defense in Parricide: When Unlawful Aggression Fails
A son who killed his father in a drunken argument could not invoke self-defense because unlawful aggression was not proven. The Supreme Court explains why.
Self-Defense in Parricide: When Unlawful Aggression Is Not Enough
The Supreme Court rejected a son's self-defense claim after he shot his father, clarifying the strict requirements for justifying a killing under Philippine law.
Self-Defense Claims and Unlawful Aggression: Lessons from People v. Tadeo
The Supreme Court clarifies when self-defense fails and how intoxication, provocation, and surrender affect criminal liability in homicide cases.
Self-Defense and Treachery: Examining Intent and Unlawful Aggression in Homicide Cases
The Supreme Court clarifies when a victim's bad character matters in murder cases and why treachery negates self-defense claims.
Self-Defense Claim Fails: Unlawful Aggression Must Be Proven in Homicide Cases
Philippine Supreme Court ruling explains why a barangay captain's self-defense plea failed in a homicide case, and what elements must be proven.
Self-Defense, Treachery, and Voluntary Surrender: How the Supreme Court Redefined Criminal Liability in Homici
A barangay captain's claim of self-defense fails as the Court clarifies the elements of unlawful aggression and mitigating circumstances in homicide.
Self-Defense and Treachery: The Limits of Justification in Philippine Criminal Law
When self-defense fails: the Supreme Court explains unlawful aggression, treachery, and why a sudden attack on a sleeping victim is murder.
Self-Defense vs. Unlawful Aggression: Distinguishing Homicide from Murder in Philippine Law
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies self-defense requirements and treachery elements, reducing murder conviction to homicide in People v. Cariño.
Self-Defense Claims: Proving Imminent Threat and Reasonable Response in Homicide Cases
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the burden of proof for self-defense claims in homicide cases, requiring clear evidence of unlawful aggression.
Self-Defense, Unlawful Aggression, and Conspiracy: Lessons from People v. Tumayao
The Supreme Court clarifies self-defense, conspiracy, and treachery in a murder case, and explains the effect of an accused's death on appeal.
Self-Defense vs. Unlawful Aggression: Lessons from a Philippine Homicide Case
Understanding self-defense claims in Philippine criminal law, and why unlawful aggression is the foundation of any successful defense.
Treachery Despite Frontal Attack When Suddenness Negates Self Defense
Learn when a frontal attack can still be treacherous, and why claiming self-defense requires proving unlawful aggression with clear and convincing evidence.
When Does Self-Defense Hold Up in Court? Examining Unlawful Aggression
The Supreme Court explains why self-defense failed in a police shooting case, and what unlawful aggression really requires.
Self-Defense: When Apparent Danger Justifies Deadly Force in Philippine Law
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when self-defense justifies deadly force, requiring actual unlawful aggression, not just perceived threats.
When Self-Defense Fails: Unlawful Aggression and Reasonable Necessity in Philippine Law
When does self-defense hold up in Philippine courts? The Supreme Court explains unlawful aggression and reasonable necessity in People v. Dela Cruz.
Self-Defense or Murder: Unpacking Unlawful Aggression and Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law
A Philippine Army soldier's claim of self-defense fails when the victim was shot from behind. Learn the legal requisites of unlawful aggression and treachery.
Self-Defense in the Philippines: When Does It Justify Homicide?
Philippine law recognizes self-defense, but it requires unlawful aggression, reasonable necessity, and lack of provocation. Learn the rules.
Unlawful Aggression in Self-Defense: Key to Avoiding Murder Charges in the Philippines
Learn how the Supreme Court defines unlawful aggression in self-defense claims and why failing to prove it can lead to murder or homicide convictions.
Self-Defense in the Philippines: When Does It Justify Homicide?
Philippine law requires unlawful aggression, reasonable necessity, and lack of provocation for self-defense to justify homicide.