From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 73–81 of 81 articles for “corporate officers”

Sort:Newest Oldest

Aug 4, 1999 charter party deadfreight demurrage shipping law code of commerce corporate liability

Deadfreight and Demurrage in Charter Parties: NFA v. Hongfil Shipping

Supreme Court clarifies when charterers owe deadfreight but not demurrage, and when corporate officers escape personal liability.

Nov 16, 1998 bouncing checks law bp 22 corporate liability criminal law check fraud philippine law

Bouncing Checks and Corporate Liability: When Officers Face Criminal Risk in the Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when corporate officers are criminally liable for bouncing checks under BP 22, including defenses and penalties.

May 19, 1998 corporate law piercing the corporate veil securities and exchange commission suspension of payments personal liability jurisprudence

Piercing the Corporate Veil: When Are Corporate Officers Personally Liable in the Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when corporate officers may be personally liable and the limits of SEC jurisdiction over suspension of payments.

Jun 2, 1997 labor-law illegal-dismissal solidary-liability corporate-officers retrenchment bad-faith

Solidary Liability of Corporate Officers: When Are They Liable for Illegal Dismissal

Corporate officers can be held personally liable for illegal dismissal when they act in bad faith, as shown in this Supreme Court ruling.

Apr 15, 1997 labor law corporate liability piercing corporate veil separation pay nlrc labor standards

Piercing the Corporate Veil: When Corporate Officers Are Liable for Labor Violations

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on when corporate officers can be held personally liable for unpaid wages, separation pay, and other labor standard benefits.

Mar 26, 1997 bouncing checks law bp 22 corporate liability criminal law check fraud philippine supreme court

Bouncing Checks Law: Corporate Officers Personally Liable for Signed Checks

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on BP 22: corporate officers who sign bouncing checks face personal criminal liability, even if signed in blank.

Mar 13, 1997 corporate law labor law piercing corporate veil separation pay close corporation corporate officers

Piercing the Corporate Veil: When Are Company Officers Liable for Corporate Debts in the Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on when corporate officers and close corporation stockholders can be held personally liable for separation pay.

Jan 21, 1997 intra-corporate dispute sec jurisdiction corporate officers illegal dismissal labor law corporation code

Intra-Corporate Disputes: When Corporate Officers Fall Under SEC Jurisdiction

Explaining Tabang v. NLRC: why a corporate officer's dismissal is an intra-corporate dispute under SEC jurisdiction, not a labor case.

Mar 13, 1996 corporate law labor law piercing the corporate veil personal liability nlrc supreme court

Piercing the Corporate Veil: When Philippine Corporate Officers Are Personally Liable

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when corporate officers can be held personally liable for labor claims, explaining the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil.