From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 961–984 of 1,220 articles for “judge”

Demolition Orders Require Due Hearing Protecting Property Rights in Ejectment Cases

Philippine Supreme Court rules judges must hold a hearing before issuing demolition orders in ejectment cases, protecting property rights.

Judicial Accountability When A Judges Actions Create Doubt Voluntary Inhibition IS KEY

Gross Immorality of Judges: Dismissal and Three-Year Suspension in Aranas

The Supreme Court dismissed a judge for gross immorality over an extramarital affair, suspending him from law practice for three years.

Judicial Efficiency: The Imperative of Timely Case Resolution and Accountability for Delays

A Supreme Court ruling reminds judges that missing the three-month deadline to decide cases is gross inefficiency, even if transcripts are delayed or parties ask for more time.

Baseless Administrative Complaints Against Judges: Lessons from Manahon v. Judge Tan

The Supreme Court dismissed a baseless administrative complaint against a judge, reinforcing that substantial evidence is required and frivolous charges will be reprimanded.

Double Jeopardy Denied: The Perils of Forum Shopping in Philippine Law

When can a judge inhibit from a case? The Supreme Court explains the limits of voluntary inhibition and the dangers of forum shopping.

Judges Must Decide Cases Within 90 Days: Lessons from Montes v. Bugtas

The Supreme Court reminds judges that failing to decide cases within the constitutional 90-day period is gross inefficiency, even with heavy workloads.

Judicial Misconduct: The Limits of Helping and the Imperative of Impartiality

A look at how the Supreme Court defines judicial misconduct, emphasizing the limits of assistance and the non-negotiable duty of impartiality for judges.

Judges Must Know the Law: Gross Ignorance and Its Consequences

When a judge issues warrants and conducts proceedings without knowing basic rules, the Supreme Court steps in. Learn from Oporto v. Monserate.

Judge Fined for Delay: The Duty to Decide Cases Promptly Under Summary Procedure

A judge's four-month delay in deciding a forcible entry case violated the Rules on Summary Procedure and the constitutional right to speedy disposition.

Upholding Judicial Efficiency: The Consequences of Delay in Case Resolution

A judge's four-month delay in deciding a summary procedure case leads to a fine, reinforcing the constitutional right to speedy disposition of cases.

Upholding Labor Tribunal Authority Regular Courts Barred From Enjoining Nlrc Decisions

Philippine Supreme Court affirms that regular courts cannot issue TROs against NLRC decisions, holding a judge liable for gross ignorance of the law.

Supreme Court Fines Judge for Delay, Upholding Right to Speedy Disposition of Cases

The Supreme Court fined a judge P5,000 for deciding a summary procedure case four months late, reaffirming the constitutional right to speedy disposition of cases.

When a Judge Crosses the Line: Interference in a Criminal Case and the Price of Impropriety

A Court of Appeals justice was dismissed for trying to influence a prosecutor in a drug case. This article explains the ruling and its lessons.

Judicial Impartiality: Dismissal of Judge for Gross Ignorance and Partiality in Election Case

Supreme Court dismisses judge for gross ignorance and partiality in election protest, applying obsolete laws to favor a litigant.

Upholding Judicial Efficiency: Timely Resolution of Motions in Estate Proceedings

The Supreme Court reminds judges that failing to resolve motions within 90 days is gross inefficiency, even in complex estate cases.

Judicial Efficiency Judges Must Resolve Cases Promptly OR Face Administrative Sanctions

Judges Must Resolve Cases Within 90 Days or Face Administrative Sanctions

Supreme Court reminds judges to decide cases within 90 days, penalizing delay with fines for gross inefficiency.

Judicial Ethics: Judge Fined P20,000 for Solemnizing Bigamous Marriage

A judge who solemnized a bigamous marriage despite knowing of the prior subsisting marriage was fined P20,000 for gross ignorance of the law.

Judicial Efficiency VS DUE Process Balancing Timeliness AND Fairness IN Court Decisions

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies that judges must decide cases within prescribed periods; pending transcripts or heavy caseloads do not excuse delay.

Due Process in Sentencing: When a Judge's Discretion Goes Too Far

A judge's order denying credit for time served without hearing violates due process. Learn the limits of judicial discretion.

When a Clerk of Court Oversteps Judicial Power: Limits on Court Personnel Authority

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies that clerks of court cannot approve bail or order releases—judicial powers reserved for judges alone.

Judicial Overreach: What Happens When a Judge Exceeds Jurisdiction in Criminal Cases

A judge issued arrest warrants after losing jurisdiction over a case. The Supreme Court ruled it was gross ignorance of the law.

Judicial Accountability: Neglect of Duty vs Malicious Delay in Summary Procedure Cases

A judge's overzealous document review caused delay in summary procedure cases, resulting in a fine for neglect of duty.