Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Moral Ascendancy in Rape Cases When Familial Trust Becomes a Weapon
How Philippine courts treat incestuous rape, moral ascendancy, and why the death penalty was reduced to reclusion perpetua.
Incestuous Rape and Parental Authority: When Consent Is Invalid in Familial Sexual Abuse Cases
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on incestuous rape clarifies that a father's moral ascendancy and threats invalidate any claim of consent from a minor daughter.
Rape Conviction Upheld: Credibility of Witness Testimony and Circumstantial Evidence
Supreme Court affirms rape conviction based on credible witness testimony and circumstantial evidence, explaining rules on unconscious victims and alibi.
Rape Conviction Upheld: Credibility of the Accuser and the Role of Physical Evidence
The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction, ruling that a credible victim's testimony suffices even without physical evidence and despite delayed reporting.
Incestuous Rape and Relationship as an Aggravating Circumstance: People v. Mendi
In People v. Mendi, the Supreme Court affirmed three rape convictions and clarified how a father's relationship to his daughter aggravates the crime.
Delayed Reporting and Sleep as Defense: When Rape Becomes Acts of Lasciviousness
A father's conviction for rape was reduced to acts of lasciviousness because the victim slept through the alleged assault. Explore the ruling.
Rape vs Acts of Lasciviousness: Proving the Crime Beyond Reasonable Doubt
How Philippine courts distinguish rape from acts of lasciviousness and what evidence proves carnal knowledge beyond reasonable doubt.
Intent Matters Distinguishing Robbery With Rape From Separate Crimes
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when a sexual assault followed by taking property is one complex crime or separate offenses.
Due Process in Rape Cases: Why Alleging Qualifying Circumstances Matters for Death Penalty
The Supreme Court explains why the death penalty in rape cases requires the qualifying circumstances to be alleged in the information, not just proved at trial.
Unwavering Testimony: How Philippine Courts Uphold Victim Credibility in Rape Cases
Learn how Philippine courts assess witness credibility in criminal cases, using the Supreme Court's ruling in People v. Navarro as a guide.
Moral Ascendancy in Child Rape Cases: When a Stepfather's Influence Replaces Physical Force
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on how a stepfather's moral ascendancy can substitute for force or intimidation in child rape cases.
The Weight of Circumstantial Evidence in Securing Justice for Victims in the Philippines
How the Supreme Court upheld a rape-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence, explaining the rules for proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Rape and the Requisite Allegations: Protecting Due Process in Criminal Prosecutions
The Supreme Court clarifies that special qualifying circumstances like relationship must be alleged in the information to justify the death penalty for rape.
Rape and Parental Relations: Clarifying Special Qualifying Circumstances in Philippine Law
A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when rape qualifies for the death penalty and why allegations of relationship must appear in the information.
Incestuous Rape: Why Alleging Minority in the Information Matters
A father's rape conviction was reduced from death to reclusion perpetua because the Information failed to properly allege the victim's minority.
Rape and Relationship Qualifying Circumstances and Penalties
Understand how rape penalties change when a qualifying circumstance like relationship is proven, based on Philippine Supreme Court rulings.
Protecting the Vulnerable: Upholding the Death Penalty in Child Rape Cases
The Supreme Court affirms the death penalty for the rape of a six-year-old, detailing the rules on victim credibility and evidence.
Rape of a Mentally Retarded Person: Consent and Knowledge of Disability
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on rape of a mental retardate, consent, and the need to allege knowledge of disability in the information.
Rape and Consent: Examining the Boundaries of Force and Intimidation in Philippine Law
The Supreme Court clarifies that rape is defined by lack of consent, not by the timing of physical force. A knife held during the act proves intimidation, and the death penalty was reduced to reclusio
THE Testimony OF Rape Victims Credibility Corroboration AND THE Burden OF Proof
Eyewitness Testimony and Positive Identification in Murder Cases: People v. Paraiso
How the Supreme Court weighed eyewitness credibility, minor inconsistencies, and alibi in a rape-with-homicide conviction.
Reexamining Eyewitness Testimony and Guilt in Philippine Rape-Homicide Cases
The Supreme Court affirms a rape-homicide conviction, explaining how minor inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony and alibi defenses are weighed.
Reasonable Doubt in Rape Cases: When Discrepancies Do Not Destroy Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that minor inconsistencies in rape testimony do not create reasonable doubt when material facts are credible and consistent.
Child Rape Conviction Upheld on Victim's Testimony and Medico-Legal Findings
In People v. Osing, the Supreme Court upheld a child rape conviction based on the victim's lone testimony and medico-legal evidence, stressing that corroboration is not required.