From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 121–144 of 294 articles for “administrative case”

Gross Ignorance of the Law: When Judges Overstep Final Judgments

A judge's motu proprio reversal of a final and executory order leads to dismissal for gross ignorance of the law in this administrative case.

Judicial Accountability: Court Personnel Disciplined for Delayed Execution and Misconduct

Supreme Court disciplines court personnel for delaying execution of judgment, issuing defective writs, and sheriff misconduct in administrative case.

TRO Rules Explained: Lessons from the Lago v. Abul Administrative Case

A judge's suspension-worthy errors in issuing TROs and injunctions, and the procedural rules every litigant should know.

Burden OF Proof IN Administrative Cases Sustaining Allegations OF Grave Misconduct

Sandiganbayan Collegiality: Lessons from the Administrative Case Against Justices Ong, Hernandez, and Ponferra

The Supreme Court clarifies that Sandiganbayan divisions must sit as a collegial body, with all three justices present during trial proceedings.

Fresh Period Rule in Administrative Cases: Panolino v. Tajala Explained

When does the Neypes fresh period rule apply? The Supreme Court clarifies it does not govern DENR administrative appeals.

Presumption of Regularity vs. Misconduct Claims: Integrity in Court Execution

Learn how the presumption of regularity in official duty interacts with misconduct allegations in administrative cases, from a 2010 Supreme Court ruling.

Public Trust Dismissal for Grave Misconduct in Extortion Case

Supreme Court reinstates dismissal of BIR examiner for grave misconduct in extortion, clarifying substantial evidence standard in administrative cases.

Defining Formally Charged Clarifying Dishonesty IN Administrative Cases

When Is a Public Official "Formally Charged"? Supreme Court Clarifies in Administrative Case

The Supreme Court clarifies when a government employee is considered "formally charged," ruling that mere complaints pending preliminary investigation do not amount to formal charges.

Ombudsman Decisions and the Limits of Appeal in Administrative Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies when Ombudsman rulings become final and unappealable, and why the Court of Appeals cannot touch a one-month suspension order.

Streamlining Justice: When Ombudsman Orders Are Final and Unappealable

Learn when Ombudsman decisions become final and unappealable in administrative cases, and why the Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals.

Ombudsman Cannot Intervene in Appeals of Its Own Decisions: Impartiality in Administrative Cases

The Supreme Court rules the Ombudsman cannot intervene in appeals of its own decisions, preserving impartiality in administrative cases.

PD 957 Criminal Cases Belong to Regular Courts, Not HLURB

Supreme Court ruling clarifies that HLURB handles only civil and administrative cases; criminal violations of PD 957 go to regular courts.

Due Process in Administrative Cases: PEZA Cancellation of Ecozone Registration Upheld

Supreme Court rules on due process and substantial evidence in administrative proceedings involving PEZA cancellation of ecozone enterprise registration.

CSC Jurisdiction Over Teacher Discipline Cases: The Macud Ruling

Supreme Court clarifies CSC jurisdiction over administrative cases involving public school teachers, even under RA 4670.

Upholding Ethical Standards: Judge Dismissed for Gross Immorality in Landmark Administrative Case

Supreme Court dismisses judge for extramarital affair and suspends him from law practice for three years.

Upholding Honesty IN Public Service Falsification OF Time Records AND Mitigating Circumstances IN Administrative Cases

Court Personnel Extortion: Proving Guilt in Administrative Cases

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on extortion by court personnel, explaining how guilt is proven in administrative cases and penalties.

Gross Ignorance of the Law: Judge Fined for Procedural Lapses in Summary Procedure Case

A judge's failure to apply the Revised Rules on Summary Procedure leads to a fine for gross ignorance of the law. Learn the key lessons from this administrative case.

Filing an Administrative Case Against a Judge in the Philippines: No Need to Exhaust Judicial Remedies First

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that exhaustion of judicial remedies is not required before filing an administrative case against a judge.

Due Process in Administrative Cases: Substantial Evidence Trumps Technical Rules

Explore how Philippine courts weigh substantial evidence over procedural technicalities in administrative proceedings, ensuring fairness and justice.

When Court Orders Are Final: Lessons from an Administrative Case Against a Judge

A judge's temporary custody order isn't a final judgment. Learn when court rulings become final and how to challenge them properly.

Judicial Misconduct and Substantial Evidence in Administrative Cases

A judge was suspended for soliciting P100,000 to fix cases. The Supreme Court explains the substantial evidence standard in administrative cases.