From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 121–144 of 156 articles for “public officials”

Ombudsman's Primary Jurisdiction: Who Investigates Public Officials First

The Supreme Court clarifies that the Ombudsman's primary jurisdiction over public officials' cases prevails once it takes cognizance of a complaint.

Reliance on Subordinates as Good Faith Defense Against Gross Neglect of Duty Charges

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on when public officials may rely on subordinates' recommendations without incurring gross neglect liability.

Recovering Ill-Gotten Wealth: The State's Right to Sue Public Officials' Heirs

The Supreme Court affirms the State's right to recover ill-gotten wealth from the heirs of public officials, free from prescription, laches, or estoppel.

Suspension of Public Officials: Fraudulent Acts and the Anti-Graft Law

Explore how the Supreme Court handled a mayor's suspension and reinstatement in an Anti-Graft case, clarifying undue injury under RA 3019.

Ombudsmans Discretion Investigating Complaints Against Public Officials IN THE Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies the Ombudsman's discretionary power to investigate complaints against public officials and the limits of judicial review.

Preventive Suspension Under the Anti-Graft Law Is Mandatory, Not Discretionary

Preventive suspension of public officials under Section 13 of R.A. 3019 is mandatory once a valid information is filed. The Court explains why.

Obstruction OF Justice Defining THE Sandiganbayans Jurisdiction IN Cases Involving Public Officials

Public Officials' Duty to Act in the Best Interest of the Service: Sevilla v. Gocon

When does a public official's omission become an administrative offense? The Supreme Court clarifies the line between dishonesty and conduct prejudicial to the service.

Gifts to Public Officials: Defining Corrupt Practices Under Philippine Law

Explaining when gifts to public officials violate the Anti-Graft Law, and why the gift's value is not always an essential element.

Public Official Liability and Conspiracy in Administrative Graft Cases

Explaining when public officials face administrative liability for errors, and when conspiracy or bad faith must be proven.

Good Faith in Administrative Actions: Protecting Public Officials From Liability

The Supreme Court clarifies that good faith in filing administrative cases shields public officials from disciplinary liability, but lawyers must still respect courts.

Negligence in Guaranteeing Loans: A Public Official's Duty of Care

Court employee suspended for negligently guaranteeing loans for an impostor. Learn the duty of care for public officials.

Good Faith Reliance on Subordinates Can Defeat Anti-Graft Charges Against Public Officials

Supreme Court rules a public official who relies in good faith on subordinates' certifications cannot be prosecuted for graft absent evident bad faith.

Good Faith and Emergency Purchases: When Public Officials Escape Graft Liability

Explore how the Supreme Court protected a public official from graft charges, citing good faith and emergency procurement during a blood shortage crisis.

Public Officials' Duty to Act Promptly: Lessons from a Clerk of Court's Misconduct

A Supreme Court ruling reminds public officials of their duty to act promptly on requests and maintain propriety in office.

Public Officials and Due Diligence in Government Land Transactions

A Supreme Court ruling shows why possession of public land does not equal ownership, and why only the State can sue to recover public land wrongly titled.

Preventive Suspension and the Sandiganbayan's Authority Over Public Officials

The Supreme Court upholds the Sandiganbayan's power to order preventive suspension of public officials, including senators, under RA 3019.

Ombudsman's Power to Prosecute Public Officials in All Courts Explained

The Supreme Court clarifies that the Ombudsman can investigate and prosecute public officials in both the Sandiganbayan and regular courts.

Liability of Public Officials, Good Faith, and the Limits of Supervisory Responsibility in Philippine Law

Philippine jurisprudence on public official liability, good faith defenses, and the boundaries of supervisory responsibility explained for lay readers.

CSC Resolution Cannot Be Enforced While Pending Appeal: Due Process Rules

The Supreme Court clarifies that a CSC resolution pending appeal cannot be immediately enforced, upholding due process rights of public officials.

Public Officials Beware: Good Faith Reliance on Subordinates Is No Shield Against Graft Charges

The Supreme Court clarifies that public officials cannot evade graft liability by claiming reliance on subordinates, especially when approving large transactions.

State Immunity vs Personal Liability: Defining the Limits of Official Authority

The Supreme Court clarifies when public officials can be sued personally despite state immunity, using the Lansang v. Court of Appeals case.

Preventive Suspension of Public Officials: Graft Law Applies to Election Offenses

Unauthorized use of government property is fraud, so preventive suspension under the Anti-Graft Law applies even in election offense cases.

Sheriffs Authority VS Abuse OF Power Defining Limits IN Foreclosure Proceedings

When can courts suspend public officials? Juan v. People clarifies preventive suspension under the Anti-Graft Law for election offenses.