From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 145–156 of 156 articles for “public officials”

Gross Negligence of Public Officials: Understanding Liability in Philippine Law

When are public officials liable for gross negligence? This article explains the legal standard and how Philippine courts apply it.

Citizen Watchdogs and Libel: The Vasquez Standard for Criticizing Public Officials

The Supreme Court acquits a citizen who denounced a barangay chairman, clarifying libel law for public officials in the Philippines.

Delegation of Power and Sandiganbayan Jurisdiction: Salary Grade Determination for Public Officials

Explaining how DBM salary grade assignments determine Sandiganbayan jurisdiction over public officials, and why such delegation is constitutional.

Void Contracts and Official Overreach: Due Process in Philippine Law

When can public officials take over a leased public market? The Supreme Court clarifies void contracts, due process, and criminal liability under the Anti-Graft Law.

Holdover Principle Criminal Intent Key Lessons From Lecaroz v Sandiganbayan for Public Officials

The Supreme Court explains holdover doctrine and criminal intent in Lecaroz v Sandiganbayan, a landmark case for Philippine public officials.

Ombudsman Jurisdiction and Preventive Suspension: Safeguarding Public Accountability

The Supreme Court clarifies the Ombudsman's jurisdiction over public officials and the limits of preventive suspension under R.A. 6770.

Re-Election and Criminal Liability: Why Public Officials Can Still Face Suspension for Past Misdeeds

Re-election does not erase criminal liability. The Supreme Court clarifies preventive suspension still applies to public officials for prior-term offenses.

Preventive Suspension Under RA 3019: When Public Officials Must Step Aside

The Supreme Court clarifies that preventive suspension of public officials facing graft charges under RA 3019 is mandatory, not discretionary. Learn the rules.

Ombudsman's Power to Prosecute: Understanding Its Limits and Scope in the Philippines

The Supreme Court upholds the Ombudsman's power to investigate and prosecute public officials under R.A. 6770, clarifying constitutional limits.

Obeying Orders: Understanding Criminal Liability for Public Officials in the Philippines

A 1997 Supreme Court ruling clarifies the Ombudsman's power to investigate and prosecute public officials, explaining how criminal liability attaches.

Malversation in the Philippines: When Can a Public Official Be Held Liable

Explaining when public officials face malversation charges under Article 217, and why COA audit clearance does not automatically end criminal liability.

Conflict of Interest Under RA 3019: The Domingo Case on Public Office Integrity

A mayor's conviction for conflict of interest under RA 3019 Section 3(h) shows why public officials must avoid even the appearance of impropriety.