From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–5 of 5 articles for “re-election”

Condonation Doctrine in Philippine Administrative Law: What Re-Election Means for Elected Officials

Explaining the condonation doctrine, its prospective abandonment by the Supreme Court, and how re-election can absolve prior administrative misconduct.

Doctrine of Condonation: When Re-Election Erases Past Misconduct

The Supreme Court explains when re-election can erase past administrative misconduct, and when it cannot.

Re-Election as Condonation: Clarifying Disqualification Based on Prior Administrative Removal

Explains when prior administrative removal disqualifies a local candidate, and when re-election condones past misconduct under Section 40(b), LGC.

Re-Election and Criminal Liability: Why Public Officials Can Still Face Suspension for Past Misdeeds

Re-election does not erase criminal liability. The Supreme Court clarifies preventive suspension still applies to public officials for prior-term offenses.

Condonation Doctrine: Can Re-Elected Officials Be Disciplined for Prior Misconduct

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on whether re-election condones prior administrative misconduct of local elective officials.