From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 145–159 of 159 articles for “qualifying”

Why Qualifying Circumstances Must Be Pleaded in Rape Cases: People v. Medina

The Supreme Court explains why qualifying circumstances like relationship must be alleged in the information, or the death penalty cannot be imposed.

Homicide vs Murder: Why Proving Qualifying Circumstances Matters in Philippine Law

The Supreme Court explains why proving treachery and evident premeditation raises a killing from homicide to murder in Philippine law.

Why a Rape Survivor's Testimony Prevails in Philippine Courts

The Supreme Court explains why a rape victim's court testimony outweighs minor inconsistencies in her sworn statement, and the rules on qualifying circumstances.

Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law: Understanding Intent and Unexpected Attacks

The Supreme Court clarifies treachery as a qualifying circumstance in murder, explaining sudden attacks and how it absorbs abuse of superior strength.

Treachery and Qualifying Circumstances: Understanding Murder vs Homicide in the Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court explains why treachery must be alleged in the information to convict for murder, not just homicide.

Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law: Understanding Intent and Qualifying Circumstances

The Supreme Court explains treachery, evident premeditation, and conspiracy in a brutal multiple murder case from Negros Oriental.

Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law: Sudden Attack From Behind as Qualifying Circumstance

When does a sudden attack from behind constitute treachery? The Supreme Court explains in People v. Mesa.

When Can a Judge Be Disqualified for Bias? Impartiality in Philippine Courts

Philippine Supreme Court explains when a judge's rulings amount to disqualifying bias, and why adverse decisions alone are not enough.

Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law: Understanding Intent and Qualifying Circumstances

Learn how Philippine courts define treachery as a qualifying circumstance in murder, explained through a Supreme Court case.

Witness Identification and Conspiracy in Philippine Murder Cases

How the Supreme Court weighed witness credibility, conspiracy, and qualifying circumstances in a murder conviction.

Self-Defense and Conspiracy in Homicide Cases: Key Legal Principles from People v. Gerolaga

Supreme Court clarifies self-defense, conspiracy, and the qualifying circumstance of reward in homicide cases.

Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law: Intent and Qualifying Circumstances

The Supreme Court explains when treachery qualifies a killing as murder, and why sudden attacks alone do not prove it.

Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law: Understanding Intent and Qualifying Circumstances

The Supreme Court explains treachery as a qualifying circumstance in murder, using People v. Villegas to illustrate sudden, unexpected attacks.

Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law: Intent, Liability, and the Limits of Qualifying Circumstances

A Supreme Court ruling explains when treachery qualifies a killing as murder, and how conspiracy affects criminal liability in the Philippines.

Treachery in Philippine Criminal Law: Application and Implications

How Philippine courts apply treachery as a qualifying circumstance in murder, explained through the 1996 Supreme Court ruling in People v. Caritativo.