Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Proving Guilt Beyond Doubt: How Circumstantial Evidence Works in Philippine Robbery with Homicide Cases
Philippine Supreme Court explains when circumstantial evidence suffices to convict for robbery with homicide, and why alibi fails.
Alibi and Denial in Philippine Criminal Cases: Lessons from People v. Raganas
Why alibi and denial rarely convince Philippine courts, explained through People v. Raganas, a robbery with homicide case built on circumstantial evidence.
Conspiracy in Robbery With Homicide: When Presence Means Principal Liability in Philippine Law
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on how conspiracy in robbery with homicide makes all participants liable as principals, even without direct participation in the killing.
Robbery with Homicide: When Circumstantial Evidence and Voluntary Confessions Convict
The Supreme Court affirms a robbery-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence and voluntary admissions to a confidant, not custodial interrogation.
Circumstantial Evidence and Confessions to Confidants: Robbery with Homicide Conviction
The Supreme Court affirms a robbery-with-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence and voluntary admissions to a trusted police officer.
Robbery With Homicide in the Philippines: Eyewitness Testimony and the Weight of Dying Declarations
Learn how Philippine courts weigh eyewitness testimony, dying declarations, and alibi in murder cases, as shown in People v. Atrejenio.
Witness Credibility Is Key in Robbery With Homicide Convictions in the Philippines
How Philippine courts weigh witness credibility in robbery with homicide cases, and why alibi rarely prevails when eyewitnesses positively identify the accused.
Burden of Proof in Philippine Robbery With Homicide Cases: The Insanity Defense
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the burden of proof for the insanity defense in robbery with homicide cases, requiring complete deprivation of reason.
Irresistible Force: When You Are Not Criminally Liable Under Philippine Law
The Supreme Court explains when acting under irresistible force or duress exempts a person from criminal liability, acquitting a tricycle driver of robbery with homicide.
When Witnesses Can't See: Proving Robbery With Homicide Through Circumstantial Evidence
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on how circumstantial evidence can prove robbery with homicide even without eyewitnesses to the killing.
The Power of Eyewitness Testimony in Philippine Courts: People v. De la Cruz
How Philippine courts weigh eyewitness testimony, alibi, and circumstantial evidence in robbery with homicide cases.
Intent Is Key: Distinguishing Robbery With Homicide From Separate Crimes in Philippine Law
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that robbery with homicide requires proof of intent to rob before the killing, not merely taking property afterward.
The Power of a Single Eyewitness Testimony in Philippine Robbery With Homicide Cases
How one credible eyewitness can convict in robbery with homicide, explained through a 1998 Supreme Court ruling.
Robbery With Homicide Establishing Intent AND Liability IN Philippine LAW
Explains the Supreme Court ruling on probable cause for falsification of public documents and illegal use of alias under Philippine law.
Eyewitness Identification and Conspiracy in Robbery With Homicide: People v. Caisip
How Philippine courts weigh eyewitness testimony, alibi, and treachery in murder cases, explained through People v. Caisip.
Robbery With Homicide Establishing Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt IN Philippine LAW 2
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on robbery with homicide, explaining the elements of the crime and how the prosecution must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Treachery in Philippine Law: Understanding Intent and Its Impact on Criminal Liability
Explore how Philippine courts weigh intent, treachery, and confessions in robbery with homicide cases, as shown in People v. Jerez.
Robbery With Homicide: Proving Intent Through Res Gestae Evidence
How a spontaneous admission helped prove robbery with homicide, and why res gestae evidence matters in Philippine criminal cases.
Robbery With Homicide: When a Conspirator Is Liable for the Acts of Cohorts
The Supreme Court explains conspiracy in robbery with homicide, holding a lookout liable for the killing committed by a co-conspirator.
Homicide vs Robbery With Homicide: Key Distinctions in Philippine Law
Philippine Supreme Court ruling explains when a killing is simple homicide, not robbery with homicide, and why robbery must be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Robbery vs Homicide: Key Differences and Legal Consequences in the Philippines
Understand how Philippine courts distinguish robbery with homicide from plain homicide, and why the distinction matters for penalties and convictions.
Robbery With Homicide and Conspiracy: What the Supreme Court Says
Explaining the special complex crime of robbery with homicide, conspiracy liability, and the rules on identification and confessions under Philippine law.
Intent Matters Distinguishing Robbery With Homicide From Separate Crimes
A look at how Philippine courts determine intent in robbery with homicide cases, using a 1997 Supreme Court ruling as guide.
Robbery With Homicide: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Philippine Law
A 1997 Supreme Court ruling explains how Philippine courts establish guilt for robbery with homicide and why alibi fails against positive identification.