From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 145–161 of 161 articles for “sandiganbayan”

Judicial Delay in the Philippines: When Inaction Becomes Actionable Misconduct

The Supreme Court clarifies when a judge's delay in resolving motions becomes administrative misconduct, using a Sandiganbayan case as the benchmark.

Delegation of Power and Sandiganbayan Jurisdiction: Salary Grade Determination for Public Officials

Explaining how DBM salary grade assignments determine Sandiganbayan jurisdiction over public officials, and why such delegation is constitutional.

Proving Actual Damage in Graft Cases: Lessons from Avila v. Sandiganbayan

Actual injury must be proven in Section 3(e) graft cases. Avila v. Sandiganbayan shows why evidence of damage is essential.

Holdover Principle Criminal Intent Key Lessons From Lecaroz v Sandiganbayan for Public Officials

The Supreme Court explains holdover doctrine and criminal intent in Lecaroz v Sandiganbayan, a landmark case for Philippine public officials.

Reopening a Criminal Case: When Courts Abuse Discretion in the Philippines

The Supreme Court nullified the Sandiganbayan's reopening of a criminal case against Miriam Defensor Santiago, ruling it was grave abuse of discretion.

Reopening a Criminal Case After Evidence Is Closed: The Santiago v. Sandiganbayan Guide

When can a court reopen a criminal case to hear more evidence? The Supreme Court explains the limits and the due process rights of the accused.

Sandiganbayan Jurisdiction When Graft Cases Against Local Officials Fall Under Anti Graft Court

Explains when the Sandiganbayan has jurisdiction over graft cases involving local officials, using the Supreme Court ruling in Rodrigo v. Sandiganbayan.

Upholding Judicial Impartiality: Timely Case Resolution and Ethical Conduct Matter

The Supreme Court affirms Sandiganbayan's lifting of sequestration orders, underscoring strict compliance with PCGG rules and constitutional time limits.

Preliminary Investigation as a Substantive Right: The Duterte v. Sandiganbayan Doctrine

The right to preliminary investigation is substantive, not a mere formality. Duterte v. Sandiganbayan shows how its violation can void criminal charges.

Dismissal by Sandiganbayan: Proper Legal Remedy and Mootness in Philippine Courts

Learn when a Sandiganbayan dismissal is appealable via Rule 45, not certiorari, and when cases become moot.

Undue Injury in Philippine Anti-Graft Law: Why Actual Damage Is Crucial

Explaining the Supreme Court's ruling in Llorente v. Sandiganbayan that in graft cases.

Graft and Corruption: Understanding Undue Injury Under Philippine Law

Explaining undue injury in Anti-Graft law through Amper v. Sandiganbayan, where a city engineer used a government backhoe for treasure hunting.

When Is a Private Individual Considered a Public Officer? Malversation and Sandiganbayan Jurisdiction

A private individual designated as BIR custodian of distrained property is not a public officer, so the Sandiganbayan lacks jurisdiction over him for malversation.

Marijuana Possession and the Retroactive Application of Favorable Criminal Laws in the Philippines

Explaining when procedural laws apply retroactively, using the Subido v. Sandiganbayan ruling on jurisdiction and vested rights.

Sandiganbayan Jurisdiction over Quo Warranto: The PCGG Exception

When can the Sandiganbayan hear a quo warranto case? The Supreme Court explains the exception involving PCGG and sequestered assets.

Crafting Effective Legal Pleadings: The Bill of Particulars in Philippine Law

Learn how the Supreme Court clarified the bill of particulars under Philippine law, using the landmark PCGG v. Sandiganbayan case.

Tax Credit Claims and Official Certifications: Lessons from Pareño v. Sandiganbayan

BIR officers cannot be convicted for relying on official certifications when processing tax credit claims absent proof of bad faith or conspiracy.