From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 169–192 of 1,984 articles for “sec”

Understanding the Critical Role of Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Insights from a Landmark Philippine Supreme

A Supreme Court ruling on drug possession shows why strict compliance with Section 21, RA 9165, is essential for conviction.

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Procedural Lapses Can Mean Acquittal

The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect after police failed to justify deviations from Section 21 of RA 9165, highlighting the importance of chain of custody.

Understanding the Chain of Custody Rule in Philippine Drug Cases: Insights from a Supreme Court Ruling

A Supreme Court ruling explains the chain of custody rule in drug cases and why compliance with Section 21 of RA 9165 is crucial.

Protecting Homebuyers: How Philippine Law Safeguards Your Investment in Foreclosure Cases

A look at how Philippine law protects homebuyers from defective foreclosure sales, ensuring their investment remains secure.

Unfair Competition as a Continuing Offense: What the Petron v. Yao Ruling Means

The Supreme Court clarifies when selling counterfeit goods is a continuing offense, affecting jurisdiction and prosecution strategy.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: Why Prosecutorial Consent Matters

The Supreme Court clarifies that plea bargaining in drug cases requires the prosecutor's consent, and explains the limits of A.M. No. 18-03-16-SC.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: What the Supreme Court's Majingcar Ruling Means

The Supreme Court clarifies when courts may allow plea bargaining in drug cases and the prosecutor's role in the process.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: Consent Rules, DOJ Circulars, and What the High Court Settled

The Supreme Court clarifies when prosecutors must consent to plea bargains in drug cases and why courts cannot strike down DOJ circulars on their own.

Management Prerogative vs. Constructive Dismissal: Balancing Employer Rights and Employee Security

The Supreme Court clarifies when loss of trust, negligence, and abandonment justify dismissal, protecting employees from arbitrary termination.

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Strict Compliance Matters After RA 10640

The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect for broken chain of custody and missing witnesses, reinforcing strict compliance with Section 21 of RA 9165.

The Prosecutor's Consent in Plea Bargaining: Insights from a Philippine Supreme Court Ruling

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that a prosecutor's consent is indispensable for a valid plea bargain in drugs cases.

Arson with Homicide: How Circumstantial Evidence Secured a Conviction

The Supreme Court affirmed an arson-with-homicide conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence. Learn the legal standard and key lessons.

Seafarer Disability Claims: Res Judicata and Medical Assessments Under POEA-SEC

The Supreme Court clarifies when a dismissed seafarer claim bars a later disability suit, and how conflicting medical opinions are resolved.

Navigating Employee Incentives Legal Boundaries AND Accountability IN THE Philippine Public Sector

The Supreme Court upholds COA's disallowance of SSS employee incentives, clarifying legal limits and accountability rules for public sector benefits.

Understanding Work-Related Illnesses and Disability Benefits for Seafarers in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies when seafarers with work-related illnesses like Meniere's Disease can claim full disability benefits under the POEA-SEC and CBA.

Unlocking Bank Secrets: The AMLC's Role in Financial Transparency and Criminal Prosecution

The Supreme Court clarifies the AMLC's duty to disclose bank records in criminal cases, balancing confidentiality with prosecution.

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: When Police Lapses Lead to Acquittal

The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect over police failure to secure required witnesses during inventory, reinforcing strict chain of custody rules.

Navigating Disability Benefits for Seafarers: Understanding Work-Related Illnesses and Legal Standards

The Supreme Court clarifies who qualifies as a seafarer and the burden of proof for work-related illness claims under the POEA-SEC.

Ensuring Chain of Custody Integrity: The Key to Successful Drug Convictions in the Philippines

The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect due to broken chain of custody, highlighting the strict requirements under Section 21 of RA 9165.

Navigating Disability Benefits for Seafarers: Understanding Total and Permanent Disability in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies when a seafarer's injury qualifies as total and permanent disability, not just partial, under the POEA-SEC.

Good Faith in Government Procurement: When Brand Specification Is Not Graft

The Supreme Court clarifies that procurement irregularities do not automatically prove graft under Section 3(e) of the Anti-Graft Law.

Navigating Disability Benefits: The Importance of Timely Reporting for Seafarers

A seafarer's disability claim can fail without timely reporting and compliance with the POEA-SEC's mandatory procedures.

Masturbation in a Child's Presence Is Child Abuse Under RA 7610: De Vera v. People

The Supreme Court rules that masturbating in front of a minor is psychological abuse under Section 10(a) of RA 7610, not mere unjust vexation.

Burden of Proof and Inconsistent Testimony: Acquittal in Robbery with Rape Case

The Supreme Court acquits in a robbery with rape case due to material inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence, underscoring the burden of proof.