From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 169–189 of 189 articles for “trial court”

Challenging Evidence in Philippine Courts: Interlocutory Orders and Certiorari

Learn when you can challenge a trial court's evidentiary rulings in the Philippines—and why certiorari usually isn't the answer.

Second Chances in Court: Understanding Appeals After Amended Judgments

When a trial court amends its decision after you've appealed, do you need to file another notice of appeal? The Supreme Court clarifies.

Credibility of Victim Testimony in Rape Cases: Lessons from People v. Ferrer

Philippine courts rely heavily on victim credibility in rape cases. People v. Ferrer shows why trial court findings on witness demeanor are rarely overturned.

Rape Conviction Upheld: The Importance of Credibility in Sexual Assault Cases

The Supreme Court affirms a stepfather's four rape convictions, underscoring how trial courts assess witness credibility in sexual assault cases.

Philippine Election Law: RTC Jurisdiction Over Election Offenses Despite Lower Penalties

Philippine Supreme Court ruling: Regional Trial Courts keep exclusive jurisdiction over election offenses even if penalties are six years or less.

Credibility of Child Rape Victims: Why Trial Court Observations Matter in Philippine Rape Cases

The Supreme Court affirms that a rape victim's credible testimony alone can sustain a conviction, and explains conspiracy in robbery with rape.

Why Regional Trial Courts Lack Jurisdiction Over Reckless Imprudence Cases

Learn why the Supreme Court ruled that Regional Trial Courts lack jurisdiction over reckless imprudence cases involving light felonies and property damage.

Credibility Is Key: Why Philippine Courts Prioritize Victim Testimony in Criminal Cases

Philippine courts give great weight to trial court findings on witness credibility. Learn why in People v. De la Cruz.

How Philippine Courts Assess Witness Credibility and Nighttime Aggravation

A 1998 Supreme Court ruling explains how trial courts weigh witness credibility, self-defense claims, and when nighttime aggravates a crime.

Execution Pending Appeal in Philippine Election Protests: When Can a Trial Court Still Act

The Supreme Court clarifies when a trial court may still order execution pending appeal in election protests, even after an opponent files a notice of appeal.

Double Jeopardy in the Philippines: When Partial Promulgation of a Decision Does Not Count

When a trial court promulgates only the civil liability part of a conviction, the accused cannot claim double jeopardy to block the later promulgation of the criminal penalty.

Why Drug Cases Stay in Regional Trial Courts Even for Small Amounts

A 1997 Supreme Court ruling explains why RTCs keep jurisdiction over drug offenses regardless of the quantity involved or penalty.

Judicial Accountability: Independent Assessment of Justice Secretary's Resolutions in Philippine Courts

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on trial courts' duty to independently assess Justice Secretary's resolutions in withdrawal of criminal informations.

When Sequestration Does Not Oust Trial Courts: PAGCOR v. Court of Appeals

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies that sequestration alone does not strip regular courts of jurisdiction over ownership disputes involving sequestered assets.

Discharge of an Accomplice as a State Witness: Safeguarding Justice in Philippine Courts

The Supreme Court affirms that trial courts' factual findings and witness credibility assessments are conclusive unless arbitrary, in a murder conviction.

Losing Control: Understanding Loss of Jurisdiction After Appeal in Philippine Courts

When a case is appealed, the trial court loses jurisdiction. This administrative case explains the rule and its limits.

Conspiracy and Credibility: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Philippine Criminal Law

The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction, explaining how trial court credibility findings and circumstantial evidence establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Rape Conviction Understanding Credibility OF Witnesses AND Victim Testimony IN Philippine LAW

Philippine courts rely on credible witness testimony in rape cases. This article explains how trial courts assess victim credibility and prosecution evidence.

When Can a Municipal Trial Court Hear Your Case: Unlawful Detainer Jurisdiction Limits

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that failure to serve demand to vacate deprives MTCC of jurisdiction over unlawful detainer cases.

Eyewitness Testimony and Reasonable Doubt: When Convictions Get Overturned

The Supreme Court explains when flawed eyewitness testimony and trial court speculation require acquittal under the reasonable doubt standard.

Judicial Accountability: Why Courts Must Follow Procedure in Capital Cases

Philippine Supreme Court annuls death sentence in rape case, reminding trial courts that guilty pleas in capital offenses require full evidentiary proof.