From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–15 of 15 articles for “bir ruling”

VAT Refund Timelines: The 120+30 Day Rule and Its Window Period Exception

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies VAT refund filing deadlines, the mandatory 120+30 day rule, and the window period exception under BIR Ruling DA-489-03.

Navigating Tax Refund Deadlines: The 120-Day Rule and Its Window Period Exception

Learn how the Supreme Court clarified the 120+30 day rule for VAT refund claims and the window period exception under BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03.

Understanding Retroactive Application of Regulatory Resolutions Impact on Electric Cooperatives in the Philipp

This article explains the Supreme Court's ruling on the 120-day period for VAT refund claims and how BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 affects electric cooperatives and taxpayers.

Equitable Estoppel in VAT Refund Claims: Protecting Taxpayers From Conflicting BIR Rulings

The Supreme Court shields taxpayers who relied on BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 from premature VAT refund dismissals through equitable estoppel.

VAT Refund Timeliness: The 120-Day Rule, BIR Ruling DA-489-03, and Strict Proof Requirements

Learn how the Supreme Court applied the San Roque doctrine to a prematurely filed VAT refund claim and the strict rules on zero-rated sales and invoicing.

Untangling VAT Refund Timelines: How a Misleading BIR Ruling Saved a Taxpayer's Claim

Philippine Supreme Court explains when a prematurely filed VAT refund claim survives, and why strict invoicing rules still apply.

Equitable Estoppel in VAT Refund Claims: Protection Against BIR Rulings

The Supreme Court protects taxpayers who relied on BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03, allowing premature VAT refund claims during the window period.

VAT Refund Timelines: Strict Compliance Prevails Over Prior BIR Rulings

Supreme Court clarifies mandatory 120+30 day VAT refund periods; late judicial claims fail despite BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03.

Clarifying Deposit Substitutes: The 20-Lender Rule and Tax Implications in Bond Transactions

The Supreme Court clarifies when treasury bonds qualify as deposit substitutes subject to 20% final withholding tax, and the limits of BIR ruling retroactivity.

Navigating VAT Refund Timelines: How Premature Filing Can Still Succeed Under Equitable Estoppel

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when premature VAT refund claims may still prosper under equitable estoppel from BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03.

Strict Deadlines in VAT Refund Claims: The 120+30 Day Rule and Its Exceptions

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the mandatory 120+30 day periods for VAT refund claims, and the BIR ruling that temporarily allowed premature judicial appeals.

Untangling VAT Refund Claims: The 120-Day Rule and Reliance on BIR Rulings

The Supreme Court clarifies when VAT refund judicial claims must be filed, and how BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 protected taxpayers.

Equitable Estoppel and Premature VAT Refund Claims: When Taxpayers Can Rely on BIR Rulings

The Supreme Court ruled that taxpayers may rely on BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 and file VAT refund claims early, invoking equitable estoppel against the government.

VAT Refund Claims: The 120-Day Waiting Period and the BIR Ruling That Saved It

The Supreme Court clarifies the 120-day waiting period for VAT refund claims and the effect of BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03.

Non-Retroactivity of BIR Rulings: The Benguet Case and Taxpayer Protection

Learn how the Supreme Court protects taxpayers from retroactive BIR rulings, based on the landmark Benguet Corporation case.