From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–6 of 6 articles for “bir rulings”

Equitable Estoppel in VAT Refund Claims: Protecting Taxpayers From Conflicting BIR Rulings

The Supreme Court shields taxpayers who relied on BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 from premature VAT refund dismissals through equitable estoppel.

Equitable Estoppel in VAT Refund Claims: Protection Against BIR Rulings

The Supreme Court protects taxpayers who relied on BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03, allowing premature VAT refund claims during the window period.

VAT Refund Timelines: Strict Compliance Prevails Over Prior BIR Rulings

Supreme Court clarifies mandatory 120+30 day VAT refund periods; late judicial claims fail despite BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03.

Untangling VAT Refund Claims: The 120-Day Rule and Reliance on BIR Rulings

The Supreme Court clarifies when VAT refund judicial claims must be filed, and how BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 protected taxpayers.

Equitable Estoppel and Premature VAT Refund Claims: When Taxpayers Can Rely on BIR Rulings

The Supreme Court ruled that taxpayers may rely on BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 and file VAT refund claims early, invoking equitable estoppel against the government.

Non-Retroactivity of BIR Rulings: The Benguet Case and Taxpayer Protection

Learn how the Supreme Court protects taxpayers from retroactive BIR rulings, based on the landmark Benguet Corporation case.