Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 115 of 15 articles for candidacy

Election Law Disqualification for Illegal Use of Public Funds in the Philippines

Learn how a final conviction with perpetual disqualification can cancel a candidacy, as ruled by the Supreme Court.

Perpetual Disqualification: When Does It Take Effect in Philippine Law?

The Supreme Court clarifies when the accessory penalty of perpetual disqualification from public office takes effect under Philippine law.

Perpetual Disqualification and Material Misrepresentation in Election Candidacy

The Supreme Court ruled that filing a Certificate of Candidacy while under perpetual disqualification is material misrepresentation, voiding the CoC and making votes stray.

Perpetual Disqualification: How a Criminal Conviction Affects Candidacy in the Philippines

A criminal conviction can permanently bar a person from running for public office in the Philippines. Learn the rules on disqualification, substitution, and what voters should know.

Citizenship Disputes and Electoral Timelines: Gonzalez v. COMELEC on Disqualification Petitions

The Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between disqualification and cancellation of COC petitions, and the strict 25-day filing period under the election code.

Residency vs. Domicile in Philippine Elections: The Pundaodaya Ruling

The Supreme Court clarifies that voter registration and property ownership do not prove election residency, which legally means domicile.

Material Misrepresentation in a COC: When a False Statement Can Nullify an Election Win

A false statement in a Certificate of Candidacy on a material qualification can cancel a candidacy and nullify an election victory, as Velasco v. COMELEC shows.

Domicile Dilemmas: Residency Requirements for Philippine Election Candidates

The Supreme Court explains what "residence" really means for election candidates—and why buying property alone won't establish domicile.

Three-Term Limit for Local Officials: When an Election Loss Resets the Clock

Election loss interrupts an official's service and resets the three-term limit, as clarified by the Supreme Court in Adormeo v. COMELEC.

Nicknames and Initials on Ballots: The Villarosa v. HRET Precedent

Learn how the Supreme Court ruled on nickname and initials votes in Villarosa v. HRET, and what it means for ballot validity.

Dual Citizenship and Election in the Philippines: Clarifying Qualifications for Public Office

The Supreme Court clarifies when dual citizenship disqualifies a candidate and how filing a certificate of candidacy can cure it.

COMELEC vs. HRET Jurisdiction: When Election Disputes Shift to the Electoral Tribunal

Learn when COMELEC loses jurisdiction over House election contests and the HRET becomes the sole judge of a member's election, returns, and qualifications.

Residency Requirement for Philippine Candidates: The Domino Doctrine on Domicile

Philippine election law equates residency with domicile. The Domino case shows why voter registration and genuine intent matter for candidates.

Unwritten Company Policy and Illegal Dismissal: The Bangloy Case

Can an employee be fired under an unwritten policy? The Bangloy case shows why written, communicated rules are vital in Philippine labor law.

SK Election Age Requirements: The Supreme Court Ruling Explained

Understand the age qualification rules for Sangguniang Kabataan elections and the key Supreme Court ruling that clarified them.