From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–13 of 13 articles for “code of judicial conduct”

When a Judge Serves as Attorney-in-Fact: A Cautionary Tale on Judicial Impropriety

The Supreme Court reminds judges that serving as attorney-in-fact for non-family members violates the Code of Judicial Conduct and constitutes impropriety.

Judicial Misconduct and Sexual Harassment: Violating the Code of Judicial Conduct

A Supreme Court ruling holds that a judge who sexually assaulted a litigant in his own home is guilty of gross misconduct, even after retirement from the bench.

Judicial Conduct: Courtesy and Impartiality in Court Proceedings

A judge's insulting remarks about a lawyer's law school violate the Code of Judicial Conduct and warrant reprimand.

Judicial Impartiality: When a Judge's Conduct Crosses the Line

A judge's private meeting with a litigant to discuss a pending case violates the Code of Judicial Conduct and erodes public trust.

Judicial Conduct: Mitigating Circumstances and the Duty to Prevent Undue Delay

A judge's duty to prevent undue delay in court proceedings, and how mitigating circumstances affect administrative liability under the Code of Judicial Conduct.

Judicial Inefficiency: A Judge's Duty to Resolve Pending Matters Promptly

The Supreme Court reminds judges that delay in resolving incidents violates the Constitution and the Code of Judicial Conduct.

Judicial Temperament: When a Judge's Words Violate the Code of Judicial Conduct

A Supreme Court ruling on a judge fined for vulgar language shows why judicial temperament and courtesy are non-negotiable.

When a Judge Serves as Attorney-in-Fact: Ethical Limits on Fiduciary Roles

The Supreme Court clarifies when a judge's private role as attorney-in-fact crosses into an ethical violation under the Code of Judicial Conduct.

When Judges Can't Serve as Attorneys-in-Fact: Fiduciary Limits Under the Code of Judicial Conduct

The Supreme Court clarifies when a judge's private role as attorney-in-fact violates judicial ethics, even for relatives.

Judicial Impartiality: Avoiding the Appearance of Impropriety in Judicial Conduct

A judge's private mediation between litigants in pending cases violates the Code of Judicial Conduct and constitutes simple misconduct.

Judicial Ethics: When Can a Judge's Spouse Practice Law in His Court

Explore the ethical boundaries for judges' spouses practicing law, based on Philippine Supreme Court rulings and the Code of Judicial Conduct.

Judicial Ethics: Impartiality and Decorum in the Philippine Judiciary

A Supreme Court ruling reminds judges that intemperate speech and offensive attacks on fellow magistrates violate the Code of Judicial Conduct.

Judicial Bias Understanding When A Judge Must Step Down IN Philippine Courts

Learn when Philippine judges must inhibit or step down from a case due to bias, based on Supreme Court rulings and the Code of Judicial Conduct.