Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 112 of 12 articles for court intervention

When Can a Mayor Order Demolition Without a Court Order? The Altarejos Ruling

The Supreme Court clarifies the limits of a mayor's power to order demolition without court intervention, reinforcing due process and property rights.

Judicial Authority and Bank Liquidation: Understanding the Limits of Court Intervention

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when judges overstep their authority in bank liquidation proceedings, and the consequences of doing so.

Casino Franchise Agreements: PAGCOR Obligations and Investment Protection

Supreme Court guidance on casino franchise agreements, PAGCOR's licensing powers, and the limits of court intervention in administrative disputes.

Impeachment and Judicial Review: Defining the Limits of Court Intervention

The Supreme Court rules on the JBC's composition, clarifying constitutional limits on congressional representation and judicial review.

When a Constitutional Question Is Ripe for Court Intervention: Defining Judicial Review Limits

Philippine Savings Bank v. Geronimo clarifies the ripeness doctrine and the burden of proving compliance with publication requirements in extrajudicial foreclosures.

BSP’s Exclusive Authority Over Bank Receivership: What It Means for Depositors and Creditors

The Supreme Court affirms the BSP’s exclusive authority over bank receivership, clarifying the limits of court intervention and the rights of depositors and creditors.

Bidding Disqualification Upholding Agency Discretion In Government Contracts

The Supreme Court affirms agency discretion in government bidding, explaining protest rules, judicial hierarchy, and the limits of court intervention.

Mootness in Philippine Law: When Court Intervention Becomes Unnecessary

Learn how Philippine courts handle moot cases and when judicial intervention becomes unnecessary, with practical guidance for litigants.

Certiorari Limits: When Factual Errors Do Not Justify Supreme Court Intervention

The Supreme Court clarifies that Rule 45 certiorari cannot correct mere factual errors, only grave abuse of discretion.

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies: Due Process in PNP Dismissal Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies that dismissed PNP officers must exhaust all administrative remedies, including appeals to the DILG Secretary and CSC, before seeking court intervention.

Extrajudicial Contract Rescission in the Philippines: Reclaiming Property Without Court Intervention

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when a party may extrajudicially rescind a contract and retake property, and when court action becomes necessary.

Philippine Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Finality and Limited Court Intervention

Explore how the Supreme Court affirmed arbitration finality under RA 876 while correcting interest rates and damages in National Steel Corp. v. E. Willkom Enterprises.