Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 124 of 53 articles for criminal intent

Marital Infidelity and Psychological Violence: Understanding RA 9262

The Supreme Court clarifies when marital infidelity becomes psychological violence under RA 9262, and whether a psychological report is required for conviction.

Overvaluing Property When Does It Become A Crime Under Philippine Banking Laws

The Supreme Court clarifies when a bank appraiser's overvaluation of property becomes a crime under the General Banking Law, requiring proof of intent to influence the bank.

Intent to Gain in Theft Cases: Good Faith Ownership Claims Under Philippine Law

Philippine theft law requires intent to gain. Learn how a good faith belief in ownership can defeat criminal charges, citing Amarille v. People.

Illegal Recruitment and Estafa: When Overseas Job Promises Turn Into Crimes

The Supreme Court clarifies when fake overseas job offers constitute illegal recruitment and estafa, and explains the penalties under Philippine law.

Graft and Corruption: Navigating Local Government Contracts in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies direct bribery under the Revised Penal Code in a case involving Ombudsman officials and local executives.

SALN Compliance Opportunity to Correct Errors Prevents Haphazard Prosecution

Supreme Court acquits public official of SALN violation, ruling that the review and compliance procedure under RA 6713 must precede prosecution.

Conspiracy in Grave Coercion: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The Supreme Court acquits a mayor of grave coercion, ruling that conspiracy requires proof beyond reasonable doubt, not mere speculation.

Foreshore Occupancy Without Permit: Water Code Violation Upheld

The Supreme Court affirms that occupying foreshore land without a permit violates the Water Code, regardless of pending applications.

Conflict of Interest and Public Funds: When Cooperative Membership Does Not Equal Graft

Supreme Court clarifies that mere cooperative membership or past affiliation does not prove graft under the Anti-Graft Law.

Theft vs. Estafa in the Philippines: Key Distinctions and the Horca Case

Theft and estafa differ in possession and deceit. The Horca ruling shows why the distinction matters and how acquittal can still leave civil liability.

Theft by Misappropriation of Found Property: What Philippine Law Requires

Philippine law punishes keeping found property as theft. Learn the finder's duties and key lessons from a recent Supreme Court ruling.

Understanding Child Abuse Under Philippine Law: Insights From a Landmark Supreme Court Decision

The Supreme Court clarifies when specific intent is required for child abuse convictions under RA 7610, protecting children from physical maltreatment.

Good Faith and Misinterpretation in Public Office: A Guide to the Anti-Graft Law

The Supreme Court clarifies when a public officer's mistaken interpretation of rules negates criminal liability under the Anti-Graft Law.

Protecting Children Upholding Stiffer Penalties for Child Abuse Under R.A. 7610

The Supreme Court affirms a conviction for child abuse under R.A. 7610, clarifying that physical abuse of a child is penalized more heavily than ordinary physical injuries.

Corporate Records Access: Stockholder Rights and Officer Duties After Dissolution

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that a stockholder's right to inspect corporate records survives corporate dissolution and continues during liquidation.

Buy-Bust Operations and Chain of Custody: Key Lessons from People v. Eda

The Supreme Court affirms a drug conviction, clarifying the elements of illegal sale and possession and the rules on chain of custody under RA 9165.

Self-Defense vs. Criminal Intent: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Homicide Cases

Philippine Supreme Court ruling clarifies when self-defense fails and how treachery qualifies killing as murder, not homicide.

Mistake vs Malice: When Honest Error Defeats Theft Charges in the Philippines

The Supreme Court explains when honest mistake negates criminal intent in theft cases, acquitting a man who cut trees on the wrong property.

Robbery With Homicide: Intent to Rob Must Precede the Killing

The Supreme Court clarifies that robbery with homicide requires intent to rob before the killing; otherwise, only homicide may be proven.

Accountability in Conspiracy: Shared Criminal Intent Under Philippine Law

How Philippine courts infer conspiracy from concerted acts, making each participant equally liable for murder even without direct evidence of a prior agreement.

When a Drug Sale Isn't a Sale: Payment Must Be Completed for Conviction

The Supreme Court clarifies that illegal drug sale requires actual payment, not just delivery. Learn the key elements and why possession still leads to conviction.

Affinity Survives Death But Not Falsification: Estafa and Article 332

The Supreme Court rules on whether a son-in-law can invoke the Article 332 exemption from criminal liability for estafa after his wife's death.

When a Dishonored Check Cannot Be Theft: The Impossible Crime Doctrine in the Philippines

Can a worthless check be the object of theft? The Supreme Court explains the impossible crime doctrine and why intent alone is not enough.

Possession Is Key: Upholding Convictions Despite Warrantless Searches in Forestry Code Violations

The Supreme Court explains when warrantless seizures of lumber are valid and why mere possession without documents is a crime.