From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–6 of 6 articles for “direct attack”

Quieting of Title as Direct Attack: Final Judgments and Property Claims in Philippine Law

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that quieting of title is a direct attack on a certificate of title, not a prohibited collateral attack.

Quieting of Title in the Philippines: Direct vs. Collateral Attacks Explained

The Supreme Court clarifies when challenging a land title's validity is a direct attack, not a collateral one, in quieting of title cases.

Election Contests and the 15-Day Rule: Eizmendi v. Fernandez on Corporate Governance

The Supreme Court clarifies that indirect attacks on corporate elections violate the 15-day reglementary period for election contests under the Interim Rules.

Citizenship Dispute in Disbarment Case Dismissed for Lack of Direct Attack

Disbarment case dismissed because citizenship cannot be attacked collaterally; direct action required.

Direct vs Collateral Attack: Clarifying Land Title Disputes in the Philippines

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when a counterclaim to nullify a land title is a permissible direct attack, not a barred collateral one.

Challenging a Judge's Qualifications: The Fine Line Between Direct and Indirect Attacks

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between direct and indirect attacks on a judge's qualifications in administrative cases.