Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 16 of 6 articles for indivisible penalty

Eyewitness Testimony vs. Alibi: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Murder Cases

How a credible eyewitness account outweighs alibi and denial in Philippine murder convictions, per People v. Ticalo.

Mental Capacity and Rape in Philippine Law: The Hamto Case

How Philippine courts treat mentally retarded rape victims' testimony, and why mental age matters in proving rape.

Rape of an Unconscious Person in the Philippines: What the Law Says

Philippine law treats sex with an unconscious person as rape—consent cannot exist without consciousness. Learn the rules from People v. Ramos.

Self-Defense Claims in Parricide and Rape Cases: What the Supreme Court Says

A father convicted of raping his daughter claimed self-defense. The Supreme Court explains why this defense fails in parricide and rape cases.

Reclusion Perpetua in Philippine Law: Why It Remains an Indivisible Penalty

The Supreme Court clarifies that reclusion perpetua remains an indivisible penalty despite RA 7659, explaining its true duration and application in drug cases.

Death Penalty in the Philippines: Compelling Reasons and Heinous Crimes

The Supreme Court clarifies when the death penalty applies for heinous crimes and why reclusion perpetua remains an indivisible penalty under Philippine law.